Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:547
作者
Lee, Jeffrey K. [1 ]
Liles, Elizabeth G. [2 ]
Bent, Stephen [3 ]
Levin, Theodore R. [4 ]
Corley, Douglas A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Osher Ctr Integrat Med, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST; AVERAGE-RISK; LONGITUDINAL ADHERENCE; COLONOSCOPY; POPULATION; PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY; NEOPLASMS; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.7326/M13-1484
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) have been inconsistent. Purpose: To synthesize data about the diagnostic accuracy of FITs for CRC and identify factors affecting its performance characteristics. Data Sources: Online databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, and bibliographies of included studies from 1996 to 2013. Study Selection: All studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of FITs for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk adults. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and critiqued study quality. Data Synthesis: Nineteen eligible studies were included and metaanalyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of FITs for CRC were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.86), 0.94 (CI, 0.92 to 0.95), 13.10 (CI, 10.49 to 16.35), 0.23 (CI, 0.15 to 0.33), respectively, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95% (CI, 93% to 97%). There was substantial hetero-geneity between studies in both the pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates. Stratifying by cutoff value for a positive test result or removal of discontinued FIT brands resulted in homogeneous sensitivity estimates. Sensitivity for CRC improved with lower assay cutoff values for a positive test result (for example, 0.89 [CI, 0.80 to 0.95] at a cutoff value less than 20 mu g/g vs. 0.70 [CI, 0.55 to 0.81] at cutoff values of 20 to 50 mu g/g) but with a corresponding decrease in specificity. A single-sample FIT had similar sensitivity and specificity as several samples, independent of FIT brand. Limitations: Only English-language articles were included. Lack of data prevented complete subgroup analyses by FIT brand. Conclusion: Fecal immunochemical tests are moderately sensitive, are highly specific, and have high overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting CRC. Diagnostic performance of FITs depends on the cutoff value for a positive test result.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A delay in colonoscopy after positive fecal tests leads to higher incidence of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Mutneja, Hemant Raj ;
Bhurwal, Abhishek ;
Arora, Shilpa ;
Vohra, Ishaan ;
Attar, Bashar M. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (06) :1479-1486
[22]   Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review [J].
Niedermaier, Tobias ;
Weigl, Korbinian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael ;
Brenner, Hermann .
CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 7
[23]   Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
de Klerk, Clasine M. ;
Vendrig, Lisanne M. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. ;
Dekker, Evelien .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (12) :1778-1787
[24]   Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Daly, Jeanette .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2012, 112 (10) :67-69
[25]   Diagnostic accuracy of tests for leprosy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gurung, P. ;
Gomes, C. M. ;
Vernal, S. ;
Leeflang, M. M. G. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (11) :1315-1327
[26]   Artificial intelligence and colorectal neoplasia detection performances in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test: Meta-analysis and systematic review [J].
Spadaccini, Marco ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Mori, Yuichi ;
Halvorsen, Natalie ;
Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio Z. ;
Nakashima, Hirotaka ;
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Patel, Harsh K. ;
Antonelli, Giulio ;
Khalaf, Kareem ;
Rizkala, Tommy ;
Ramai, Daryl ;
Rondonotti, Emanuele ;
Kamba, Shunsuke ;
Maselli, Roberta ;
Correale, Loredana ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Sharma, Prateek ;
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Repici, Alessandro .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2025,
[27]   Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Ladermann, Alexandre ;
Collin, Philippe ;
Zbinden, Olivia ;
Meynard, Timon ;
Saffarini, Mo ;
Chiu, Joe Chih-Hao .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
[28]   Diagnostic accuracy of risk assessment and fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: Results from a population-based program and meta-analysis [J].
Wang, Ziyang ;
Teng, Jiaoyue ;
Wu, Weimiao ;
Dou, Jianming ;
Wong, Martin C. S. ;
Gong, Yangming ;
Huang, Junjie ;
Gu, Kai ;
Xu, Wanghong .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (17) :18189-18200
[29]   Colorectal Cancer Screening With Traditional and New-generation Fecal Immunochemical Tests: A Critical Review of Fecal Occult Blood Tests [J].
Meklin, Jannica ;
Syrjanen, Kari ;
Eskelinen, Matti .
ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (02) :575-581
[30]   Effect of aspirin, warfarin, and proton-pump inhibitors on performance of fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Han, Zhongxue ;
Nan, Xueping ;
Ma, Mingjun ;
Zhou, Ruchen ;
Wang, Peizhu ;
Liu, Jing ;
Li, Yanqing ;
Li, Yueyue .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (08) :4355-4368