Prescription Contraceptive Sales Following the Affordable Care Act

被引:10
作者
Bullinger, Lindsey Rose [1 ]
Simon, Kosali [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Tech, Sch Publ Policy, 685 Cherry St, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 East Tenth St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Prescription contraceptives; Affordable Care Act; LARC methods; INSURANCE MANDATES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EARLY IMPACT; COVERAGE; WOMEN; FERTILITY; BENEFITS; POWER; PILL;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-018-2680-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives We examine trends in prescription contraceptive sales following the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) zero-copayment contraceptive coverage mandate in areas more likely to be affected by the provision relative to areas less likely to be affected. Methods Before the ACA, several states had their own contraceptive insurance coverage mandates. Using a national prescription claims database combined with wholesaler institutional sales activity from January 2008 through June 2014, we compare sales of the intrauterine device (IUD), implant, injectable, pill, ring, and patch in states that had a state-level insurance coverage mandate before the ACA to states that did not. Results Overall, our results imply the ACA increased sales of prescription contraceptives, with stronger effects for some methods than others. Specifically, we find the ACA increased sales of injectable contraceptives, but had no significant impact on sales of the IUD, implant, pill, or patch in states without a state-level mandate before the ACA relative to states that had a state-level mandate. We also find suggestive evidence of a reduction in sales of the ring. Conclusions for Practice Demand responses to changes in out-of-pocket expenses for contraception vary across methods. Eliminating copays could promote the use of contraceptives, but is not the only approach to increasing contraceptive utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 666
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] THE POWER OF THE PILL FOR THE NEXT GENERATION: ORAL CONTRACEPTION'S EFFECTS ON FERTILITY, ABORTION, AND MATERNAL AND CHILD CHARACTERISTICS
    Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans
    Hungerman, Daniel M.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 94 (01) : 37 - 51
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, 2014 EMPL HLTH BEN S
  • [3] Changes in State Prescription Contraceptive Mandates For Insurers: The Effect on Women's Contraceptive Use
    Atkins, Danielle N.
    Bradford, W. David
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2014, 46 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [4] Changes in out-of-pocket costs for hormonal IUDs after implementation of the Affordable Care Act: an analysis of insurance benefit inquiries
    Bearak, Jonathan M.
    Finer, Lawrence B.
    Jerman, Jenna
    Kavanaugh, Megan L.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [5] Women Saw Large Decrease In Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Contraceptives After ACA Mandate Removed Cost Sharing
    Becker, Nora V.
    Polsky, Daniel
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (07) : 1204 - 1211
  • [6] A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement
    Bergin, Ashlee
    Tristan, Sigrid
    Terplan, Mishka
    Gilliam, Melissa L.
    Whitaker, Amy K.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (06) : 694 - 697
  • [7] The Effects of Contraception on Female Poverty
    Browne, Stephanie P.
    LaLumia, Sara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (03) : 602 - 622
  • [8] Affordable Care Act′s Mandate Eliminating Contraceptive Cost Sharing Influenced Choices Of Women With Employer Coverage
    Carlin, Caroline S.
    Fertig, Angela R.
    Dowd, Bryan E.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (09) : 1608 - 1615
  • [9] Women's Awareness of Their Contraceptive Benefits Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
    Chuang, Cynthia H.
    Mitchell, Julie L.
    Velott, Diana L.
    Legro, Richard S.
    Lehman, Erik B.
    Confer, Lindsay
    Weisman, Carol S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 105 : S713 - S715
  • [10] THE EFFECT OF PLAN B ON TEEN ABORTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM THE2006 FDA RULING
    Cintina, Inna
    Johansen, Morgen S.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 33 (03) : 418 - 433