Sex bias: Is it pervasive in otolaryngology clinical research?

被引:6
作者
Farzal, Zainab [1 ]
Stephenson, Elizabeth D. [1 ]
Kilpatrick, Lauren A. [1 ]
Senior, Brent A. [1 ]
Zanation, Adam M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Neurosurg, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
Sex bias; otolaryngology; research; INCLUSION; TRIALS; EXISTS; WOMEN; HEART;
D O I
10.1002/lary.27497
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/HypothesisRecent initiatives highlight substantial sex bias in biomedical research. The objective was to determine whether sex bias is present in otolaryngology and whether sex is appropriately analyzed as an independent variable in otolaryngology clinical research. Study DesignLiterature review. MethodsWe systematically reviewed all 2016 articles in three major otolaryngology journals: The Laryngoscope, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Extracted data included study origin, location, subspecialty, number/sex of subjects, 50% sex matching (SM50), and sex-based statistical analysis. ResultsSix hundred of 1,209 articles comprising original clinical research were reviewed including 8,997,345,495 subjects (males: 3,898,559,264 [43.3%]; females: 5,095,592,583 [56.6%]; and unknown: 3,193,648 [0.04%]). There were 533/600 (88.8%) studies that included both sexes, eight (1.3%) included females only, five (0.8%) included males only, and 56 (9.3%) did not document participant sex. Only 280 studies (46.7%) analyzed data by sex, and 330 studies (60.7%) had SM50. Sex-based statistical analysis and SM50 were similar in domestic and international studies (48.7% vs. 42.8% and 60.9% vs. 62%, respectively). Database studies performed sex-based statistical analysis more frequently than single and multi-institutional studies (79.1% vs. 40.4% and 43.4%, P < .00001). Analysis by sex was more frequently performed in head and neck surgery (53.6%) and pediatric otolaryngology (51.3%), whereas SM50 was highest in pediatric otolaryngology (86.8%) and otology (82.4%). ConclusionsSex bias exists in the clinical otolaryngology literature, with less than half the studies analyzing sex. Acknowledging the intertwinement of sex with disease pathophysiology and outcomes is important. Eliminating sex bias in research and clinical care should become a major focus for otolaryngologists. Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 129:858-864, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 864
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   INCIDENCE OF OTOSCLEROSIS AS RELATED TO RACE AND SEX [J].
ALTMANN, F ;
GLASGOLD, A ;
MACDUFF, JP .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1967, 76 (02) :377-&
[2]   Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: Where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics [J].
Anderson, GD .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2005, 14 (01) :19-29
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, DRUG SAF MOST DRUGS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CONS SEX BIOL VAR NI
[5]   Female rats are not more variable than male rats: a meta-analysis of neuroscience studies [J].
Becker, Jill B. ;
Prendergast, Brian J. ;
Liang, Jing W. .
Biology of Sex Differences, 2016, 7
[6]  
Blauwet LA, 2007, MAYO CLIN PROC, V82, P166
[7]  
BRANDT EN, 1985, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V100, P73
[8]   Breaking the Cycle: Estrous Variation Does Not Require Increased Sample Size in the Study of Female Rats [J].
Dayton, Alex ;
Exner, Eric C. ;
Bukowy, John D. ;
Stodola, Timothy J. ;
Kurth, Theresa ;
Skelton, Meredith ;
Greene, Andrew S. ;
Cowley, Allen W., Jr. .
HYPERTENSION, 2016, 68 (05) :1139-1144
[9]  
Flint PW., 2010, CUMMINGS OTOLARYNGOL, V5th
[10]   Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the national heart, lung, and blood institute. [J].
Harris, DJ ;
Douglas, PS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (07) :475-480