Evaluation of Indeterminate Renal Masses with Contrast-enhanced US: A Diagnostic Performance Study

被引:140
作者
Barr, Richard G. [1 ]
Peterson, Cynthia [1 ,2 ]
Hindi, Ammar [3 ]
机构
[1] Radiol Consultants, Youngstown, OH 44512 USA
[2] Kent State Univ, Salem, OH USA
[3] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
ULTRASOUND CONTRAST; BOSNIAK CLASSIFICATION; CELL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CYSTIC LESIONS; CT; AGENTS; DIFFERENTIATION; ANGIOMYOLIPOMA; SONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13130161
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To determine the utility of contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses. This retrospective performance study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant, with waiver of informed consent. Patients included 721 individuals referred for contrast-enhanced US with 1018 indeterminate renal masses from 1999 to 2010, identified initially with an imaging study. Three hundred twenty patients (44.4%) were female, and 401 (55.6%) were male. Patient ages ranged from 17 to 95 years (mean +/- standard deviation, 70 years +/- 15). Lesion size varied from 2 to 161 mm (mean, 26.6 mm +/- 19.5). Contrast-enhanced US enhancement patterns were used to characterize masses as benign or malignant. For lesions with a definitive diagnosis, 306 of 1018 (30.0%) were correlated with contrast-enhanced US findings: 167 (54.6%) were benign, and 139 (45.4%) were malignant. For lesions without a pathologic diagnosis, 712 (70.0%) were followed for as long as 10 years. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated by using pathologic diagnosis as the reference standard, as well as lesion stability at 3 and 5 years. Contrast-enhanced US had a sensitivity of 100% (126 of 126; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.1%, 100%), specificity of 95.0% (132 of 139; 95% CI: 89.9%, 98.0%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.7% (126 of 133), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (132 of 132). The five false-positive masses included three oncocytomas and two Bosniak category 3 cystic lesions. Of the 290 lesions that had follow-up of at least 36 months, none of the lesions demonstrated changes that necessitated lesion reclassification. If these lesions were included, assuming lesions classified as malignant were malignant, then of the 596 lesions, sensitivity was 100% (161 of 161), specificity was 96.6% (420 of 435), PPV was 91.5% (161 of 176), and NPV was 100% (420 of 420). Contrast-enhanced US evaluation is a highly sensitive and specific method for characterization of indeterminate renal masses. (C) RSNA, 2014
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   CYSTIC RENAL MASSES - USEFULNESS OF THE BOSNIAK CLASSIFICATION [J].
ARONSON, S ;
FRAZIER, HA ;
BALUCH, JD ;
HARTMAN, DS ;
CHRISTENSON, PJ .
UROLOGIC RADIOLOGY, 1991, 13 (02) :83-90
[2]   Complex cystic renal masses: Characterization with contrast-enhanced US [J].
Ascenti, Giorgio ;
Mazziotti, Silvio ;
Zimbaro, Giovanni ;
Settineri, Nicola ;
Magno, Carlo ;
Melloni, Darwin ;
Caruso, Rosario ;
Scribano, Emanuele .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) :158-165
[3]  
Barr RG, 2013, J ULTRAS MED, V32, P7
[4]  
BOSNIAK MA, 1986, RADIOLOGY, V158, P1
[7]   Ultrasound contrast agents - Basic principles [J].
Calliada, F ;
Campani, R ;
Bottinelli, O ;
Bozzini, A ;
Sommaruga, MG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 :S157-S160
[8]   Analysis of changes in attenuation of proven renal cysts on different scanning phases of triphasic MDCT [J].
Chung, EP ;
Herts, BR ;
Linnell, G ;
Novick, AC ;
Obuchowski, N ;
Coll, DM ;
Baker, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (02) :405-410
[9]   Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system [J].
Clevert, D. -A. ;
Minaifar, N. ;
Weckbach, S. ;
Jung, E. M. ;
Stock, K. ;
Reiser, M. ;
Staehler, M. .
CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2008, 39 (1-4) :171-178
[10]   The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. [J].
Clopper, CJ ;
Pearson, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1934, 26 :404-413