Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model

被引:32
作者
Yang, Chao [1 ]
Chen, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xiangdong [2 ]
Wong, S. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Civil Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Uncertainty analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Nonlinear program; Combined travel demand model; COMBINED TRIP DISTRIBUTION; NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM; CHOICE SET GENERATION; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; MODAL SPLIT; CAPACITY RELIABILITY; EQUILIBRIUM-MODELS; ROAD NETWORK; PROPAGATION; DESTINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2013.07.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Travel demand forecasting is subject to great uncertainties. A systematic uncertainty analysis can provide insights into the level of confidence on the model outputs, and also identify critical sources of uncertainty for enhancing the robustness of the travel demand model. In this paper, we develop a systematic framework for quantitative uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model (CTDM) using the analytical sensitivity-based method. The CTDM overcomes limitations of the sequential four-step procedure since it is based on a single unifying rationale. The analytical sensitivity-based method requires less computational effort than the sampling-based method. Meanwhile, the uncertainties stemming from inputs and parameters can be treated separately so that the individual and collective effects of uncertainty on the outputs can be clearly assessed and quantified. Numerical examples are finally used to demonstrate the proposed sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis method for the CTDM. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 244
页数:20
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Mathematics in Transport
[2]   Origin-based algorithms for combined travel forecasting models [J].
Bar-Gera, H ;
Boyce, D .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2003, 37 (05) :405-422
[3]   Effects of choice set size and route choice models on path-based traffic assignment [J].
Bekhor, Shlomo ;
Toledo, Tomer ;
Prashker, Joseph N. .
TRANSPORTMETRICA, 2008, 4 (02) :117-133
[4]   Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models [J].
Bekhor, Shlomo ;
Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. ;
Ramming, M. Scott .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 144 (01) :235-247
[5]  
Bell MGH, 1999, TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY, P283
[6]   TRANSPORT MODELING - SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND POLICY TESTING [J].
BONSALL, PW ;
CHAMPERNOWNE, AF ;
MASON, AC ;
WILSON, AG .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1977, 7 :153-237
[7]   Stochastic route choice set generation: Behavioral and probabilistic foundations [J].
Bovy, Piet H. L. ;
Fiorenzo-Catalano, Stella .
TRANSPORTMETRICA, 2007, 3 (03) :173-189
[8]  
Bowman J. L., 2002, WORKING PAPER
[9]   Is the sequential travel forecasting paradigm counterproductive? [J].
Boyce, D .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 128 (04) :169-183
[10]  
Boyce D, 2001, CONTRIB TO ECON ANAL, V249, P85