Estimation of canopy cover in dense mixed-species forests using airborne lidar data

被引:33
作者
Arumae, Tauri [1 ,2 ]
Lang, Mait [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Forestry & Rural Engn, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
[2] State Forest Management Ctr, Forest Survey Management Div, Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Tartu Observ, Dept Remote Sensing, Toravere, Tartumaa, Estonia
关键词
Airborne lidar data; canopy cover; tree crown models; live crown base height; phenology; LASER SCANNER DATA; LEAF-AREA INDEX; GAP FRACTION; CROWN DELINEATION; REFLECTANCE MODEL; HEIGHT; ALGORITHM; IMAGES; STANDS; PHOTOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1080/22797254.2017.1411169
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Airborne laser scanning (ALS) data and digital hemispherical photos (DHP) from 93 sample plots in Laeva test site, Estonia, were used to study effects of phenology and scan angle on the ALS-based canopy cover (CCALS) estimates. The relative share of first returns (P-1/A) for 6185 forest stands was analysed. The CCALS was calculated using different height thresholds and echoes, and was compared with the CC estimates based on DHP (CCDHP) and crown model (CCRCrown). The first of many echoes-based canopy cover estimate (CCALS, 1.3_1) saturated at values greater than 80%. The strongest correlation of CCDHP was found with CCALS, 1.3_A using all echoes and a 1.3 m height break (R-2 = 0.81, RMSE = 11.8%). Correcting the estimate for view nadir angle did not improve the correlation of CCALS, 1.3_A with CCDHP. The CCRCrown had a weak correlation (R-2 < 0.25) with CCALS and with CCDHP. The P1/A was not influenced by tree species composition, but by phenology, stand relative density and forest height; however, CCALS was not dependent on stand height. Foliage phenology had a substantial effect on CCALS and CCDHP. In dense mixed-species forests, we recommend to use all returns for canopy cover estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 141
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Characterizing stand-level forest canopy cover and height using Landsat time series, samples of airborne LiDAR, and the Random Forest algorithm [J].
Ahmed, Oumer S. ;
Franklin, Steven E. ;
Wulder, Michael A. ;
White, Joanne C. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 101 :89-101
[2]   Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data [J].
Andersen, HE ;
McGaughey, RJ ;
Reutebuch, SE .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 94 (04) :441-449
[3]  
Arumae T., 2013, Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, V58, P46
[4]  
Arumae T., 2016, Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, V64, P5
[5]  
Arumäe T, 2016, BALT FOR, V22, P275
[6]   Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas [J].
Baltsavias, EP .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 54 (2-3) :199-214
[7]   Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data [J].
Bouvier, Marc ;
Durrieu, Sylvie ;
Fournier, Richard A. ;
Renaud, Jean-Pierre .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 156 :322-334
[8]   Estimating aboveground carbon stocks of a forest affected by mountain pine beetle in Idaho using lidar and multispectral imagery [J].
Bright, Benjamin C. ;
Hicke, Jeffrey A. ;
Hudak, Andrew T. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 124 :270-281
[9]   Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs - Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques [J].
Cescatti, Alessandro .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2007, 143 (1-2) :1-12
[10]  
Chianucci F., 2014, Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, V61, P27