Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

被引:26
作者
Hong, SungEun [1 ]
Khil, Hayeong [1 ]
Lee, Dong Hoon [2 ]
Keum, NaNa [1 ,2 ]
Giovannucci, Edward L. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ, Dept Food Sci & Biotechnol, Goyang 10325, South Korea
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, Boston, MA 02138 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Div Network Med, Boston, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02138 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
alcohol intake; alcohol consumption; prostate cancer; cohort study; dose-response; meta-analysis; RED WINE CONSUMPTION; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; IDENTIFICATION; INFLAMMATION; BEVERAGES; BEER; BIAS; MEN;
D O I
10.3390/nu12082188
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Alcohol is widely consumed and is known as a major risk factor for several types of cancers. Yet, it is unclear whether alcohol consumption is associated with the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) or not. We conducted linear and non-linear dose-response meta-analyses of cohort studies on alcohol consumption and PCa risk by types of alcohol (total, wine, beer, and liquor) and PCa (non-aggressive and aggressive). Pubmed and Embase were searched through April 2020 to identify relevant studies. Summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. For non-aggressive PCa, by alcohol type, the risk increased linearly with liquor (RR per 14 g/day intake (alcohol content in standard drink) being 1.04 (95% CI = 1.02-1.06, I-2= 0%, three studies) and non-linearly with beer (Pnon-linearity= 0.045, four studies), with increased risk observed in the lower range (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.05; 14 g/day), with 1.05 (95% CI = 1.01-1.08) at 28 g/day. Wine was not significantly associated with the risk of non-aggressive PCa. For aggressive PCa, a non-linear relationship of diverse shapes was indicated for all types of alcohol in the sensitivity analysis. Compared to non-drinking, a significant positive association was more apparent at lower dose for liquor (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.20 at 14 g/day; RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03-1.31 at 28 g/day;Pnon-linearity= 0.005, three studies) but at higher doses for wine (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.90-1.16 at 28 g/day, RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.08-1.67 at 56 g/day;Pnon-linearity= 0.01, four studies). In contrast, decreased risks were indicated at lower doses of beer (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92 at 14 g/day; RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.90 at 28 g/day,Pnon-linearity< 0.001, four studies). Total alcohol consumption was not associated with both types of PCa. In this study, we found heterogeneous associations between alcohol intake and PCa by types of alcohol and PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Does amount or type of alcohol influence the risk of prostate cancer? [J].
Albertsen, K ;
Gronbæk, M .
PROSTATE, 2002, 52 (04) :297-304
[2]  
American D.G., DIETARY GUIDELINES A
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PROSTATE CANC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BMC CANCER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOBOCAN 2018
[6]  
[Anonymous], BMJ BRIT MED J
[7]   Alcohol consumption and prostate cancer risk: Results from the Melbourne collaborative cohort study [J].
Baglietto, Laura ;
Severi, Gianluca ;
English, Dallas R. ;
Hopper, John L. ;
Giles, Graham G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (06) :1501-1504
[8]   Alcohol and prostate cancer in the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study [J].
Breslow, RA ;
Wideroff, L ;
Graubard, BI ;
Erwin, D ;
Reichman, ME ;
Ziegler, RG ;
Ballard-Barbash, R .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (04) :254-261
[9]   BEER-INDUCED PROLACTIN SECRETION - A CLINICAL AND LABORATORY STUDY OF THE ROLE OF SALSOLINOL [J].
CARLSON, HE ;
WASSER, HL ;
REIDELBERGER, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1985, 60 (04) :673-677
[10]   Red wine consumption and risk of prostate cancer: the California men's health study [J].
Chao, Chun ;
Haque, Reina ;
Van Den Eeden, Stephen K. ;
Caan, Bette J. ;
Poon, Kwun-Yee T. ;
Quinn, Virginia P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 126 (01) :171-179