Airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a comparative study of bag-valve-mask, laryngeal mask airway and combitube in a bench model

被引:60
|
作者
Doerges, V
Sauer, C
Ocker, H
Wenzel, V
Schmucker, P
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Lubeck, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
airway management; bag-valve-mask; laryngeal mask airway; combitube; CPR; basic life support;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00036-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Gastric inflation and subsequent regurgitation are a potential risk of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In respect of recent investigations, principal respiratory components such as respiratory system compliance, resistance and lower esophageal sphincter pressure were adapted according to CPR situations. The purpose of our study was to assess lung ventilation and gastric inflation when performing ventilation with bag-valve-mask, laryngeal mask airway, and combitube in a bench model simulating an unintubated cardiac arrest patient. Twenty-one student nurses, without any experience in basic life support measures, ventilated the bench model with all three devices. Mean ( +/- S.D.) gastric inflation with the laryngeal mask airway (seven cases) was significantly lower than with the bag-valve-mask (0.6 +/- 0.8(1) vs 3.0 +/- 2.1 l min(-1), P < 0.01). There was no gastric inflation when ventilation was performed with the combitube. Only seven of 21 volunteers exceeded 1-min lung volumes of > 5 1 when using the bag-valve-mask, whereas mean (+/- S.D.) 1-min lung volumes with both laryngeal mask airway and combitube were significantly higher (laryngeal mask airway 15.0 +/- 6.6 l, combitube 16.6 +/- 6.8 l vs bag-valve-mask 4.8 +/- 2.7 l, P < 0.01). The time for insertion was significantly faster with both bag-valve-mask and laryngeal mask airway compared with the combitube (median: bag-valve-mask 22 s, laryngeal mask airway 37 s vs combitube 70 s, P < 0.01). This may tip the scales towards using the laryngeal mask airway during basic life support airway management. In conclusion, our data suggests that both laryngeal mask airway and combitube may be appropriate alternatives for airway management in the first few minutes of CPR. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bag-Valve-Mask versus Laryngeal Mask Airway Ventilation in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Compressions: A Simulation Study
    Dundar, Zerrin Defne
    Ayranci, Mustafa Kursat
    Kocak, Sedat
    Girisgin, Abdullah Sadik
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (02) : 189 - 194
  • [2] The incidence of regurgitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison between the bag valve mask and laryngeal mask airway
    Stone, BJ
    Chantler, PJ
    Baskett, PJF
    RESUSCITATION, 1998, 38 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [3] The use of the laryngeal mask airway and Combitube® in cardiopulmonary resuscitation;: a national survey
    Grayling, M
    Wilson, IH
    Thomas, B
    RESUSCITATION, 2002, 52 (02) : 183 - 186
  • [4] Laryngeal Tube and Laryngeal Mask Airway for Airway Management: A Comparative Study
    Zia, M. Ashraf
    Awan, Iftikhar Ali
    Aziz, Nighat
    Gilani, Taifur-Ul-Islam
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2007, 1 (03): : 99 - 102
  • [5] Comparison of Arterial Blood Gases of Laryngeal Mask Airway and Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests
    Nagao, Ken
    Koseki, Kazuhide
    Sakamoto, Tetsuya
    Igarashi, Masaki
    Ishimatsu, Shinichi
    Sato, Akira
    Hori, Shingo
    Takuhiro, Kitoji
    Sakurai, Atsushi
    Kanesaka, Shigeru
    Sadahiro, Tomohito
    Hamabe, Yuichi
    Morimua, Naoto
    Kikushima, Kimio
    Saito, Daizo
    Nonaka, Akiko
    Katsumi, Atsushi
    Suzuki, Hiroaki
    Miyauchi, Hiroshi
    Suga, Hiroyasu
    Tomioka, Jozi
    Imai, Kazutaka
    Kiyota, Kazuya
    Arima, Ken
    Matsuda, Kiyoshi
    Takahashi, Kohei
    Naito, Masafumi
    Yagi, Masaharu
    Honma, Masato
    Sasaki, Masaru
    Suzuki, Masaru
    Nakano, Minoru
    Fugiyoshi, Naohiko
    Kozima, Naoki
    Harada, Naoshige
    Ohashi, Noriyoshi
    Suzuki, Noriyuki
    Tahara, Yoshio
    Moriwaki, Ryutaro
    Takahashi, Ryoji
    Kikuchi, Satoru
    Noda, Seichi
    Oda, Shigeto
    Kitamura, Shinya
    Imaki, Shohei
    Fugikawa, Tadashi
    Kikuno, Takaaki
    Kamohara, Takashi
    Suda, Takayuki
    Ishii, Tatsuo
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (03) : 490 - 496
  • [6] THE USE OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY BY NURSES DURING CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION
    STONE, BJ
    LEACH, AB
    ALEXANDER, CA
    RUFFER, DR
    MCBETH, C
    WARWICK, JP
    BASKETT, PJF
    NICHOLLS, E
    PRIORWILLEARD, PFS
    VERGHESE, C
    JAGO, RH
    ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [7] THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN RESUSCITATION
    BAILEY, AR
    HETT, DA
    RESUSCITATION, 1994, 28 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [8] Comparison of manually triggered ventilation and bag-valve-mask ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a manikin model
    Bergrath, Sebastian
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Biermann, Henning
    Skorning, Max
    Beckers, Stefan K.
    Roertgen, Daniel
    Brokmann, Joerg Ch.
    Flege, Christian
    Fitzner, Christina
    Czaplik, Michael
    RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (04) : 488 - 493
  • [9] Ease of ventilation through the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), the laryngeal mask airway and the face mask in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation training manikin
    Garcia-Guasch, R
    Ferrà, M
    Benito, P
    Oltra, J
    Roca, J
    RESUSCITATION, 2001, 50 (02) : 173 - 177
  • [10] Complications following the use of the Combitube, tracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway
    Oczenski, W
    Krenn, H
    Dahaba, AA
    Binder, M
    El-Schahawi-Kienzl, I
    Kohout, S
    Schwarz, S
    Fitzgerald, RD
    ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (12) : 1161 - 1165