Artistic Autonomy and Heteronomy

被引:0
作者
Erjavec, Ales [1 ]
机构
[1] Filozofski Inst ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
avant-garde art; autonomy; heteronomy; political art; instrumentality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In the article, the author discusses the so-called aesthetic (or heteronomous artistic) avant-gardes, i.e. those that in the previous century insisted on the fusion of art and "life". The author discusses one of the first such outstanding examples, namely Russian constructivism, which was often (Benjamin H.D. Buchloh, Boris Groys, Jacques Ranciere, etc.) the subject of such discussion. The author shares with the mentioned writers the opinion that in the cases noted the established "formation paradigm" is insufficient for it limits the designation of modernism to its "Western" (autonomous) part. The author mostly confirms Ranciere's views on this topic and draws attention to the third variant of heteronomy, namely that which was developed by the Situationist movement.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Adorno Theodor W., 1997, AESTHETIC THEORY, P339
  • [2] Bilicic Simona, 2002, LIKOVNE BESEDE, V61, P62
  • [3] BOURDIEU P, 1993, FIELD CULTURAL PRODU, P40
  • [4] Bown Matthew Cullene, 1998, SOCIALIST REALIST PA, pxiii
  • [5] Braun Emily, 2005, MARIO SIRONI AND ITA
  • [6] Buchloh Benjamin H. D., 1984, OCTOBER, V30, P85
  • [7] Erjavec Aleg, 2003, POSTMODERNISM AND TH, P44
  • [8] Grey Camilla, 1971, THE RUSSIAN EXPERIME, P219
  • [9] Groys Boris, 1999, CELOSTNA UMETNINA ST
  • [10] Groys Boris, 1993, TEKSTURA RUSSIAN ESS, P116