Elastic intramedullary nailing as a complement to Ilizarov's method for forearm lengthening: A comparative pediatric prospective study

被引:17
作者
Jager, T. [1 ]
Popkov, D. [2 ]
Lascombes, P. [1 ]
Popkov, A. [2 ]
Journeau, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Children Hosp, Brabois Hosp Grp, Nancy Teaching Hosp Ctr, Dept Pediat Orthopaed & Traumatol, F-54511 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[2] Fed Med Biol Agcy, Interreg Orthoped Ctr, Hosp Unit 81, Seversk 634070 10, Russia
关键词
Forearm discrepancy; Lengthening; ESIN; Limb deformities; Circular external fixation; RADIAL LONGITUDINAL DEFICIENCY; CALLUS DISTRACTION; EXTERNAL FIXATOR; CHILDREN; ULNA; DEFORMITY; LIMB;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Most of the techniques for forearm lengthening involve external fixation to achieve stability and provide progressive distraction. We introduce the use of elastic stable intramedullar nailing (ESIN) in combination with external circular assembly for the procedure. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare Ilizarov's classical technique with this combined technique. Methods: Fifty-seven patients, with forearm length discrepancies or deformities either congenital or acquired, were prospectively followed-up. Patients were divided in two groups: 35 had only external fixation, and 22 had external fixation-ESIN combined techniques. Patients were assessed for clinical and radiographic outcome with a mean follow-up of 21 months after external device removal. Results: Overall lengthening was 45.0 mm. Healing index (HI) was 22.2 d/cm with the combined technique, and 32.0 d/cm with external fixation. HI was 30% better when ESIN was used, for congenital and for overall cases. Combined technique has a lower complication rate. Conclusion: Although forearm lengthening still remains a time-consuming procedure, ESIN can shorten external fixator wearing time. No additional complication occurred and bony complications seem to be limited by the nails. We recommend this technique, which we now use for most of our patients undergoing limb lengthening. Level of evidence: Level IV. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 382
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Lengthening of the congenital short femur using the Ilizarov technique A SINGLE-SURGEON SERIES [J].
Aston, W. J. S. ;
Calder, P. R. ;
Baker, D. ;
Hartley, J. ;
Hill, R. A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (07) :962-967
[2]  
BRONFEN C, 1989, CHIR PEDIATR, V30, P109
[3]  
Caton J., 1991, Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, V77, P31
[4]   Femoral lengthening over a numeral intramedullarynail in preadolescent children [J].
Gordon, JE ;
Goldfarb, CA ;
Luhmann, SJ ;
Lyons, D ;
Schoenecker, PL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (06) :930-937
[5]   Distraction lengthening of the forearm for congenital and developmental problems [J].
Horii, E ;
Nakamura, R ;
Nakao, E ;
Kato, H ;
Yajima, H .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2000, 25B (01) :15-21
[6]   Differential lengthening of the radius and ulna using the Ilizarov method [J].
Huang, SC ;
Kuo, KN .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 18 (03) :370-373
[7]  
Ilizarov G A, 1988, Basic Life Sci, V48, P323
[8]  
Ilizarov G A, 1972, Vestn Khir Im I I Grek, V108, P100
[9]  
Ilizarov G A, 1971, Ortop Travmatol Protez, V32, P20
[10]  
ILIZAROV G A, 1969, Eksperimental'naya Khirurgiya i Anesteziologiya, V14, P27