Contingent screening for Down syndrome completed in the first trimester: a multicenter study

被引:18
作者
Munoz-Cortes, M. [1 ]
Arigita, M. [1 ]
Falguera, G. [2 ]
Seres, A. [1 ]
Guix, D. [3 ]
Baldrich, E. [4 ]
Acera, A. [5 ]
Torrent, A. [6 ]
Rodriguez-Veret, A. [7 ]
Lopez-Quesada, E. [8 ]
Garcia-Moreno, R. [9 ]
Gonce, A. [1 ]
Borobio, V. [1 ]
Borrell, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Prenatal Diag Unit, Barcelona 08028, Spain
[2] Catalan Hlth Inst, SRHCC, Catalonia, Spain
[3] SRHCC Granollers, Catalonia, Spain
[4] SRHCC Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain
[5] SRHCC Cerdanyola, Catalonia, Spain
[6] SRHCC Mollet, Catalonia, Spain
[7] Consorci Sanitarri Terrassa, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain
[8] Hosp Mutua Terrassa, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain
[9] SRHCC Osona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
contingent screening; Down syndrome; prenatal screening; ultrasound markers; 1ST-TRIMESTER; TRISOMY-21; STRATEGIES; RISK; ULTRASOUND; TESTS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.9075
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess a new contingent screening strategy for Down syndrome completed in the first trimester. Methods First-trimester screening combining nuchal translucency thickness measurement and assessment of serum analytes (combined test) was offered to pregnant women who presented for prenatal care during the first trimester to nine health centers and community hospitals in the area served by the Catalan Public Health Service. If an intermediate risk (1/101-1/1000) for Down syndrome was identified, women were referred to the Hospital Clinic Barcelona for risk reassessment that included the use of secondary ultrasound markers (nasal bone, ductus venosus blood flow and tricuspid flow). Intermediate-risk women were divided into two subgroups for further analysis: high-intermediate risk (1/101-1/250) and low-intermediate risk (1/251-1/1000). We compared feasibility and efficacy of both combined and contingent screening strategies. Results The combined test, the first screening stage, was performed in 16 001 pregnant women, of whom 1617 (10.1%) were found to have an intermediate risk. Further division of this group showed that 1.8% (n = 289) of women were at high-intermediate risk and 8.3% (n = 1328) at low-intermediate risk. The contingent screening strategy significantly reduced the false-positive rate, from 3.0% to 1.3-1.8% (P < 0.001), without affecting the detection rate (which was 75-79% and 76%, with and without the contingent screening strategy, respectively). However, only 45% of intermediate-risk patients underwent the second screening step due to a preference among high-intermediate-risk (1/101-1/250) women for invasive testing and to low uptake among low-intermediate-risk (1/251-1/1000) women. Conclusions The proposed first-trimester contingent strategy reduces the screen false-positive rate without impacting on the detection rate of Down syndrome. The low compliance observed in our study may prevent its use in certain populations. Copyright (C) 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 400
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   First- and second-trimester evaluation of risk for Down syndrome [J].
Ball, Robert H. ;
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Malone, Fergal D. ;
Nyberg, David A. ;
Comstock, Christine H. ;
Saade, George R. ;
Berkowitz, Richard L. ;
Gross, Susan J. ;
Dugoff, Lorraine ;
Craigo, Sabrina D. ;
Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E. ;
Carr, Stephen R. ;
Wolfe, Honor M. ;
Emig, Danielle ;
D'Alton, Mary E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (01) :10-17
[2]   Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth? [J].
Bellieni, CV ;
Buonocore, G ;
Bagnoli, F ;
Cordelli, DM ;
Gasparre, O ;
Calonaci, F ;
Filardi, G ;
Merola, A ;
Petraglia, F .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 81 (08) :689-693
[3]   First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 combining biochemistry and ultrasound at individually optimal gestational ages. An interventional study [J].
Borrell, A ;
Casais, E ;
Fortuny, A ;
Farre, MT ;
Gonce, A ;
Sanchez, A ;
Soler, A ;
Cararach, C ;
Vanrell, JA .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2004, 24 (07) :541-545
[4]   Contingent screening for Down syndrome - results from the FaSTER trial [J].
Cuckle, Howard S. ;
Malone, Fergal D. ;
Wright, David ;
Porter, T. Flint ;
Nyberg, David A. ;
Comstock, Christine H. ;
Saade, George R. ;
Berkowitz, Richard L. ;
Ferreira, Jose C. ;
Dugoff, Lorraine ;
Craigolo, Sabrina D. ;
Timor, Ilan E. ;
Carr, Stephen R. ;
Wolfe, Honor M. ;
D'Alton, Mary E. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2008, 28 (02) :89-94
[5]  
Direccio General de Salut Publica. Departament de Salut Publica, IND SAL MAT CAT 2003
[6]   Comparison of different strategies in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: cost effectiveness analysis of computer simulation [J].
Gekas, Jean ;
Gagne, Genevieve ;
Bujold, Emmanuel ;
Douillard, Daniel ;
Forest, Jean-Claude ;
Reinharz, Daniel ;
Rousseau, Francois .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :453-456
[7]   Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal Down syndrome screening strategies: should the combined test continue to be widely used? [J].
Gekas, Jean ;
Durand, Audrey ;
Bujold, Emmanuel ;
Vallee, Maud ;
Forest, Jean-Claude ;
Rousseau, Francois ;
Reinharz, Daniel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (02) :175.e1-175.e8
[8]   Two-stage first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by ultrasound assessment and biochemical testing [J].
Kagan, K. O. ;
Staboulidou, I. ;
Cruz, J. ;
Wright, D. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (05) :542-547
[9]   Effect of deviation of nuchal translucency measurements on the performance of screening for trisomy 21 [J].
Kagan, K. O. ;
Wright, D. ;
Etchegaray, A. ;
Zhou, Y. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (06) :657-664
[10]   First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome [J].
Malone, FD ;
Canick, JA ;
Ball, RH ;
Nyberg, DA ;
Comstock, CH ;
Bukowski, R ;
Berkowitz, RL ;
Gross, SJ ;
Dugoff, L ;
Craigo, SD ;
Timor-Tritsch, IE ;
Carr, SR ;
Wolfe, HM ;
Dukes, K ;
Bianchi, DW ;
Rudnicka, AR ;
Hackshaw, AK ;
Lambert-Messerlian, G ;
Wald, NJ ;
D'Alton, ME .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (19) :2001-2011