Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment

被引:177
作者
Schmoll, H. J.
Aapro, M. S.
Poli-Bigelli, S.
Kim, H. -K.
Park, K.
Jordan, K.
von Pawel, J.
Giezek, H.
Ahmed, T.
Chan, C. Y.
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Internal Med 4, D-06120 Halle, Germany
[2] IMO Clin Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
[3] Cent Univ Venezuela, Inst Oncol Hematol, Caracas, Venezuela
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, St Vincents Hosp, Suwon, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Asklepios Fachkliniken, Ctr Pneumol & Thorac Surg, Gauting, Germany
[7] Merck Res Labs, Brussels, Belgium
[8] Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA USA
[9] Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Stn, NJ USA
关键词
aprepitant; chemotherapy; cisplatin; dexamethasone; emesis; ondansetron;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdl019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We compared an aprepitant regimen with a control regimen of ondansetron + dexamethasone given for 4 days. Patients and methods: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin >= 70 mg/m(2) were randomized to either the aprepitant regimen (aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2-3; dexamethasone on day 4) or control regimen (ondansetron + dexamethasone on days 1-4). Patients recorded vomiting, nausea and rescue therapy use. The primary end point was complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) in the overall phase (days 1-5 post-cisplatin). Results: Complete response rates were higher in the aprepitant than control group in the overall (72% versus 61%; P = 0.003), acute (day 1; 88% versus 79%; P = 0.005) and delayed phases (days 2-5; 74% versus 63%; P = 0.004), as were rates of no vomiting (overall 77% versus 62%, P <= 0.001; acute 89% versus 81%, P = 0.004; delayed 79% versus 64%, P <= 0.001). Rates of no rescue therapy were similar between groups. Conclusions: Compared with an antiemetic regimen in which ondansetron + dexamethasone were given for 4 days, the aprepitant regimen was superior in the acute, delayed and overall phases of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The aprepitant regimen should be considered a new standard of antiemetic therapy for cisplatin-treated patients. www.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NTC00090207.
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1006
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Serotonin mechanisms in chemotherapy-induced emesis in cancer patients [J].
Cubeddu, LX .
ONCOLOGY, 1996, 53 :18-25
[2]   Addition of the oral NK1 antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy [J].
de Wit, R ;
Herrstedt, J ;
Rapoport, B ;
Carides, AD ;
Carides, G ;
Elmer, M ;
Schmidt, C ;
Evans, JK ;
Horgan, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (22) :4105-4111
[3]   Should 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? - Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications [J].
Geling, O ;
Eichler, HG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (06) :1289-1294
[4]   Control of delayed nausea and vomiting with granisetron plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study [J].
Goedhals, L ;
Heron, JF ;
Kleisbauer, JP ;
Pagani, O ;
Sessa, C ;
Giger, K ;
Cavalli, F ;
Ludwig, C ;
Aapro, M ;
Bleiberg, H ;
De Wash, G ;
Dicato, M ;
Tagnon, A ;
Vanstraelen, D ;
Vindevoghel, A ;
Abratt, R ;
Falkson, G ;
Barley, V ;
Carmichael, J ;
Coleman, R ;
Davidson, N ;
Grieve, R ;
Harper, P ;
Roberts, J ;
Rustin, G ;
Naman, H ;
Schneider, M ;
Noble, A ;
Netter, P ;
Cupissol, D ;
Balmes, P ;
Cals, L ;
Khayat, D ;
Catimel, G ;
Dutin, JP ;
Boufette, P ;
Adenis, L ;
Misset, J ;
Collery, P ;
Nouvet, G ;
Chavaillon, JM ;
Blanchon, F ;
Poirier, R ;
Arnaud, A ;
Lecaer, H ;
Carles, P ;
Muir, J ;
Bonnaud, F ;
Marqueste, L ;
Clavier, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 (06) :661-666
[5]   Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines [J].
Gralla, RJ ;
Osoba, D ;
Kris, MG ;
Kirkbride, P ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Chinnery, LW ;
Clark-Snow, R ;
Gill, DP ;
Groshen, S ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, JM ;
Morrow, GR ;
Perez, EA ;
Silber, JH ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2971-2994
[6]   Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics - Perception versus reality [J].
Grunberg, SM ;
Deuson, RR ;
Mavros, P ;
Geling, O ;
Hansen, M ;
Cruciani, G ;
Daniele, B ;
De Pouvourville, G ;
Rubenstein, EB ;
Daugaard, G .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (10) :2261-2268
[7]   The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin - The Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group [J].
Hesketh, PJ ;
Grunberg, SM ;
Gralla, RJ ;
Warr, DG ;
Roila, F ;
De Wit, R ;
Chawla, SP ;
Carides, AD ;
Ianus, J ;
Elmer, ME ;
Evans, JK ;
Beck, K ;
Reines, S ;
Horgan, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (22) :4112-4119
[8]   Differential involvement of neurotransmitters through the time course of cisplatin-induced emesis as revealed by therapy with specific receptor antagonists [J].
Hesketh, PJ ;
Van Belle, S ;
Aapro, M ;
Tattersall, FD ;
Naylor, RJ ;
Hargreaves, R ;
Carides, AD ;
Evans, JK ;
Horgan, KJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (08) :1074-1080
[9]   An overview of randomised studies comparing 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to conventional anti-emetics in the prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting [J].
Jantunen, IT ;
Kataja, VV ;
Muhonen, TT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (01) :66-74
[10]   Consensus proposals for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy [J].
Kris, MG ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Herrstedt, J ;
Rittenberg, C ;
Einhorn, LH ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, J ;
Olver, I ;
Borjeson, S ;
Ballatori, E .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (02) :85-96