No zero burden assumption in a circular economy

被引:49
作者
Ilic, Danica Djuric [1 ]
Eriksson, Ola [2 ]
Odlund , Louise [1 ]
Aberg, Magnus [3 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Div Energy Syst, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Gavle, Div Bldg Energy & Environm Engn, SE-80176 Gavle, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Engn Sci, POB 539, SE-75121 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Waste management; Waste prevention; System approach; Upstream thinking; Resource management; Sustainable development; STRATEGIC SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WASTE MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOLID-WASTE; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN; LCA; PREVENTION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A majority of previous studies on environmental problems caused by waste generation have focused on waste disposal issues without fully highlighting the primary reasons behind the problems. As a consequence, efforts to reduce these problems are usually directed towards the stakeholders that provide waste treatment and disposal instead of the stakeholders that contribute to waste generation. In order to detect connections between different problems of sustainability and to suggest measures which may contribute to their solutions, this study provides a simplified overview of the mechanisms behind waste generation and management. The results from the study show that the only way to eliminate problems of sustainability is to apply an upstream approach by dealing with the primary problems which occur in the early stages of the system (e.g. overconsumption of products, as well as use of finite resources, toxic materials, and non-recyclable materials). By dealing with these problems, the emergence of secondary problems would be prevented. Thereby, stakeholders who have the highest possibility to contribute to the sustainable development of the waste generation and management are the stakeholders from the origin of the product's life cycles, such as product developers, manufacturing companies, product users and policy makers. Different trade-off situations such as contradictions between economics, recyclability, energy efficiency, make it even harder to deal with issues of sustainability related to the system and to detect the stakeholders who may contribute to the development. One of the main conclusions from this study is that when transforming society towards a circular economy, the traditional view of separate systems for production and waste management must be changed. In order to refer to all problems of sustainability and also cover the top steps of the waste hierarchy, life cycle assessment of waste management should include manufacture and use of products ending up as waste. Waste entering the waste management system with "zero burden", by releasing the previous actors of the waste life cycle from any responsibility related to the environment (i.e. by shifting the total environmental burden into the waste management system), does not capture the problems with waste generation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 362
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ASSESSING ENV IMPACT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy COM/2015/0614 final - European Environment Agency. Available at
[5]  
[Anonymous], EN SWED 2015
[6]  
Ashby MF, 2013, MATERIALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT: ECO-INFORMED MATERIAL CHOICE, 2ND EDITION, P1
[7]  
Avfall Sverige, 2020, Swedish Waste Management 2019
[8]  
Berglund C., 2005, Minerals Energy-Raw Mater. Rep., V20, P16, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14041040510033851, 10.1080/14041040510033851]
[9]  
BERTALANFFY LV, 1972, ACAD MANAGE J, V15, P407, DOI 10.5465/255139
[10]  
Bisaillon M., 2009, 20097 TRITAINFRAFMS