How to get the timing right.: A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams

被引:47
作者
Flache, Andreas [1 ]
Maes, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Behav & Social Sci, ICS, Dept Sociol, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
demographic faultline; computational modeling; teams; demographic diversity; homophily; social influence;
D O I
10.1007/s10588-008-9019-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Lau and Murnighan's faultline theory explains negative effects of demographic diversity on team performance as consequence of strong demographic faultlines. If demographic differences between group members are correlated across various dimensions, the team is likely to show a "subgroup split" that inhibits communication and effective collaboration between team members. Our paper proposes a rigorous formal and computational reconstruction of the theory. Our model integrates four elementary mechanisms of social interaction, homophily, heterophobia, social influence and rejection into a computational representation of the dynamics of both opinions and social relations in the team. Computational experiments demonstrate that the central claims of faultline theory are consistent with the model. We show furthermore that the model highlights a new structural condition that may give managers a handle to temper the negative effects of strong demographic faultlines. We call this condition the timing of contacts. Computational analyses reveal that negative effects of strong faultlines critically depend on who is when brought in contact with whom in the process of social interactions in the team. More specifically, we demonstrate that faultlines have hardly negative effects when teams are initially split into demographically homogeneous subteams that are merged only when a local consensus has developed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 51
页数:29
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abelson R. P., 1964, CONTRIBUTIONS MATH P
[2]  
Allport G.W., 1979, The nature of prejudice', V25th
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1954, FREEDOM CONTROL MODE
[4]   The dissemination of culture - A model with local convergence and global polarization [J].
Axelrod, R .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1997, 41 (02) :203-226
[5]   When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - A meta-analysis [J].
Bowers, CA ;
Pharmer, JA ;
Salas, E .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (03) :305-327
[6]   Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective [J].
Brass, DJ ;
Galaskiewicz, J ;
Greve, HR ;
Tsai, WP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (06) :795-817
[7]   THE ATTRACTION HYPOTHESIS - DO SIMILAR ATTITUDES AFFECT ANYTHING [J].
BYRNE, D ;
CLORE, GL ;
SMEATON, G .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1167-1170
[8]  
Byrne D., 1971, ATTRACTION PARADIGM
[9]   Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes [J].
Chatman, JA ;
Polzer, JT ;
Barsade, SG ;
Neale, MA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1998, 43 (04) :749-780
[10]   Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity [J].
Chen, FF ;
Kenrick, DT .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (01) :111-125