Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics

被引:108
作者
Coast, Joanna [1 ]
Smith, Richard D. [2 ]
Lorgelly, Paula [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Hlth Econ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, Hlth Policy Unit, London WC1E 7HT, England
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sect Publ Hlth & Hlth Policy, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
capability; health economics; extra-welfarism; decision making; UK; NICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper explores the spread of ideas within health economics, in relation to the impact of the capability approach to date and the extent to which it might impact in the future. The paper uses UK decision making to illustrate this spread of ideas. Within health economics, Culyer used the capability approach in developing the extra-welfarist perspective (where health status directly influences which social state is preferred). It is not a direct application of capability as the evaluation's focus remains narrow; the concern is with functioning, and maximisation is retained. Culyer's work provided a theoretical basis for using quality-adjusted life-years in decision making and this perspective is accepted as the basis for evaluation by the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). To the extent that extra-welfarism represents a capability approach, capabilities influence NICE's decision making and hence UK health care provision. This paper explores the extent to which extra-welfarism draws on the capability approach; the spread of extra-welfarist ideas; and recent interest in more direct applications of the capability approach. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1198
页数:9
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Dimensions of human development [J].
Alkire, S .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 30 (02) :181-205
[2]   QALYs and capabilities: a comment on Cookson [J].
Anand, P .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (12) :1283-1286
[3]   Capabilities and well-being: Evidence based on the Sen-Nussbaum approach to welfare [J].
Anand, P ;
Hunter, G ;
Smith, R .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2005, 74 (01) :9-55
[4]   Equity, capabilities and health [J].
Anand, P ;
Dolan, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (02) :219-222
[5]   Utilities versus rights to publicly provided goods: Arguments and evidence from health care rationing [J].
Anand, P ;
Wailoo, A .
ECONOMICA, 2000, 67 (268) :543-577
[6]  
Anand P., 2006, J SOCIO-ECON, V35, P268, DOI [10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.003, DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2005.11.003]
[7]  
Anand S, 1994, United Nations Development Programme Occasional Papers
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Economic evaluation in healthcare: merging theory with practice
[10]  
[Anonymous], HLTH EC HLTH EC