Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population

被引:39
作者
Pavlacky, David C., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [1 ,2 ]
Lowe, Andrew J. [3 ,4 ]
Prentis, Peter J. [5 ]
Green, David J. [6 ]
Goldizen, Anne W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Appl Environm Decis Anal, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Australian Ctr Evolutionary Biol & Biodivers, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[4] State Herbarium S Australia, Sci Resource Ctr, Dept Environm & Nat Resources, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[5] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Sci & Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[6] Simon Fraser Univ, Ctr Wildlife Ecol, Dept Biol Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
asymmetric gene flow; asymmetric migration; bird conservation; coalescent theory; detection probability; dispersal asymmetry; landscape ecology; landscape genetics; microsatellite DNA; subtropical rainforest; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; METAPOPULATION; CONSERVATION; HETEROGENEITY; CONSEQUENCES; COALESCENT; QUALITY; MATRIX; SINKS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01975.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Local extinctions in habitat patches and asymmetric dispersal between patches are key processes structuring animal populations in heterogeneous environments. Effective landscape conservation requires an understanding of how habitat loss and fragmentation influence demographic processes within populations and movement between populations. 2. We used patch occupancy surveys and molecular data for a rainforest bird, the logrunner (Orthonyx temminckii), to determine (i) the effects of landscape change and patch structure on local extinction; (ii) the asymmetry of emigration and immigration rates; (iii) the relative influence of local and between-population landscapes on asymmetric emigration and immigration; and (iv) the relative contributions of habitat loss and habitat fragmentation to asymmetric emigration and immigration. 3. Whether or not a patch was occupied by logrunners was primarily determined by the isolation of that patch. After controlling for patch isolation, patch occupancy declined in landscapes experiencing high levels of rainforest loss over the last 100 years. Habitat loss and fragmentation over the last century was more important than the current pattern of patch isolation alone, which suggested that immigration from neighbouring patches was unable to prevent local extinction in highly modified landscapes. 4. We discovered that dispersal between logrunner populations is highly asymmetric. Emigration rates were 39% lower when local landscapes were fragmented, but emigration was not limited by the structure of the between-population landscapes. In contrast, immigration was 37% greater when local landscapes were fragmented and was lower when the between-population landscapes were fragmented. Rainforest fragmentation influenced asymmetric dispersal to a greater extent than did rainforest loss, and a 60% reduction in mean patch area was capable of switching a population from being a net exporter to a net importer of dispersing logrunners. 5. The synergistic effects of landscape change on species occurrence and asymmetric dispersal have important implications for conservation. Conservation measures that maintain large patch sizes in the landscape may promote asymmetric dispersal from intact to fragmented landscapes and allow rainforest bird populations to persist in fragmented and degraded landscapes. These sink populations could form the kernel of source populations given sufficient habitat restoration. However, the success of this rescue effect will depend on the quality of the between-population landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 952
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The Ecological Web: More on the Distribution and Abundance of Animals
[3]   Consequences of large-scale processes for the conservation of bird populations [J].
Baillie, SR ;
Sutherland, WJ ;
Freeman, SN ;
Gregory, RD ;
Paradis, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2000, 37 :88-102
[4]   When good animals love bad habitats: Ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations [J].
Battin, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :1482-1491
[5]  
Beerli P, 1999, GENETICS, V152, P763
[6]   Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach [J].
Beerli, P ;
Felsenstein, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (08) :4563-4568
[7]  
Beerli Peter, 2009, V17, P42
[8]   Habitat loss and population decline: A meta-analysis of the patch size effect [J].
Bender, DJ ;
Contreras, TA ;
Fahrig, L .
ECOLOGY, 1998, 79 (02) :517-533
[9]   Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution [J].
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Brooks, Mollie E. ;
Clark, Connie J. ;
Geange, Shane W. ;
Poulsen, John R. ;
Stevens, M. Henry H. ;
White, Jada-Simone S. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2009, 24 (03) :127-135
[10]   Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics [J].
Bowler, DE ;
Benton, TG .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2005, 80 (02) :205-225