Methods for regional calibration-a case study using the TopNet hydrological model for the Bay of Plenty region, New Zealand

被引:3
作者
Singh, Shailesh Kumar [1 ]
Augas, Julien [2 ]
Pahlow, Markus [3 ]
Graham, Scott L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Inst Natl Rech Sci, Ctr Eau Terre Environm INRS ETE, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Canterbury, Dept Civil & Nat Resources Engn, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Lincoln, New Zealand
来源
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES | 2020年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
TopNet; regional calibration; hydrological model; ungauged catchment; DATA ASSIMILATION; PARAMETERS; UNCERTAINTY; INTERPOLATION; RAINFALL; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1080/13241583.2020.1821487
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The regional parameters can be derived from physiographic factors such as topography, soil type, and vegetation. In this study the suitability of five regional parameterisation methods was investigated and assessed to provide guidance on how to select optimal parameter sets. The overarching goal was to improve the accuracy of a hydrological model when applied at the regional scale. The regional parameterisation techniques assessed were: 1) averaging of optimal parameter sets of gauged catchments, 2) calibrating several catchments with a regional performance efficiency, 3) weighted average performance criterion for calibration, 4) largest number of positive Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients and 5) a Bayesian parameter selection method. The parameterisation methods were assessed by applying TopNet in sixteen gauged catchments in the Bay of Plenty region on the North Island of New Zealand, to then predict flows for five test catchments. It was shown that any of the five regionalisation methods considered improved flow predictions of Mean Annual Low Flow when compared to applying the same model with a prescribed spatially distributed set of the key model parameter. The improvement was less pronounced for mean flow and high flow, regardless of the method used and was linked to the hydrogeology class of the catchments.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 166
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CHC2011051 NIWA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J AM WATER RESOURCES
[3]   River Runoff Evaluation for Ungauged Watersheds by SWAP Model. 2. Application of Methods of Physiographic Similarity and Spatial Geostatistics [J].
Ayzel, G. V. ;
Gusev, E. M. ;
Nasonova, O. N. .
WATER RESOURCES, 2017, 44 (04) :547-558
[4]   Application of TOPNET in the distributed model intercomparison project [J].
Bandaragoda, C ;
Tarboton, DG ;
Woods, R .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) :178-201
[5]   Robust estimation of hydrological model parameters [J].
Bardossy, A. ;
Singh, S. K. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (06) :1273-1283
[6]   Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments [J].
Bardossy, A. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (02) :703-710
[7]   Regionalization of hydrological model parameters using data depth [J].
Bardossy, Andres ;
Singh, Shailesh Kumar .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 42 (05) :356-371
[8]   Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters under parameter uncertainty: A case study involving TOPMODEL and basins across the globe [J].
Bastola, Satish ;
Ishidaira, Hiroshi ;
Takeuchi, Kuniyoshi .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 357 (3-4) :188-206
[9]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[10]   Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology [J].
Beven, K ;
Freer, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 249 (1-4) :11-29