Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: precision and inter-subject variability

被引:43
作者
Al-Ali, D
Graichen, H
Faber, S
Englmeier, KH
Reiser, M
Eckstein, F
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Anat, Musculoskeletal Res Grp, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Orthopad Univ Klin, Res Grp Kinemat & Biomech, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Munich Klinikum, Inst Clin Radiol, Grosshadern, Germany
[4] GSF Natl Res Ctr Neuherberg, MEDIS Inst, Oberschleissheim, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00098-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Alterations of ankle cartilage are observed in degenerative and inflammatory joint disease, but cartilage cannot be directly visualized by radiography. The purpose of this study was therefore to analyze the feasibility and precision of quantitative cartilage imaging in the human hind foot (talocrural, talotarsal, and intertarsal joints), and to report the inter-subject variability for cartilage volume, thickness and surface areas. The feet of 16 healthy volunteers were imaged using a 3D gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging sequence with water-excitation. After interpolation to a resolution of 1 x 0.125 x 0.125 mm(3) the cartilage plates were segmented, and the cartilage volume, thickness, and surface areas determined. The precision (four repeated measurements) was examined in eight volunteers, the RMS average CV% being 2.1% to 10.9% in single joint surfaces, and less than or equal to3% for the cumulative values of all joints. The mean cartilage thickness ranged from 0.57 +/- 0.08 (navicular surface) to 0.89 +/- 0.19 mm (trochlear surface for tibia). In conclusion this study shows that it is feasible to quantify thin cartilage layers in the hind foot under in vivo imaging conditions, and that the precision errors are substantially smaller than the inter-subject variability in healthy subjects. (C) 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals
    Adam, C
    Eckstein, F
    Milz, S
    Putz, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1998, 193 : 203 - 214
  • [2] Burgkart R, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P2072, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2072::AID-ART357>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-3
  • [4] BURGKART R, 2001, T ORTHOPAEDIC RES SO, V26, P231
  • [5] OSTEOCHONDRAL LESIONS OF THE TALUS
    CANALE, ST
    BELDING, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1980, 62 (01) : 97 - 102
  • [6] Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements
    Cohen, ZA
    McCarthy, DM
    Kwak, SD
    Legrand, P
    Fogarasi, F
    Ciaccio, EJ
    Ateshian, GA
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1999, 7 (01) : 95 - 109
  • [7] SHOULD PERIMENOPAUSAL WOMEN BE SCREENED FOR OSTEOPOROSIS
    CUMMINGS, SR
    BLACK, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 104 (06) : 817 - 823
  • [8] DeSmet AA, 1996, SKELETAL RADIOL, V25, P159
  • [9] Eckstein F, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P137
  • [10] Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three-dimensional magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (3D MR-CCM)
    Eckstein, F
    Gavazzeni, A
    Sittek, H
    Haubner, M
    Losch, A
    Milz, S
    Englmeier, KH
    Schulte, E
    Putz, R
    Reiser, M
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (02) : 256 - 265