Risk of gastric or peritoneal recurrence, and long-term outcomes, following pancreatic cancer resection with preoperative endosonographically guided fine needle aspiration

被引:76
作者
Ngamruengphong, S. [1 ]
Xu, C. [2 ]
Woodward, T. A. [1 ]
Raimondo, M. [1 ]
Stauffer, J. A. [3 ]
Asbun, H. J. [3 ]
Wallace, M. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Florida, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Changhai Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Mayo Clin Florida, Dept Gen Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA; EUS; FNA; CYTOLOGY; TUMOR; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1344216
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: There have been concerns regarding tumor cell seeding along the needle track or within the peritoneum caused by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative EUS-FNA is associated with increased risk of stomach/peritoneal recurrence and whether the procedure affects long term survival. Methods: The records of patients diagnosed with malignant solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms who underwent surgery with curative intent between 1996 and 2012 were reviewed. Results: A total of 256 patients with similar baseline characteristics were included: 48 patients in the non-EUS-FNA group and 208 in the EUS-FNA group. Recurrence data were available for 207 patients. Median length of follow-up was 23-months (range 0-111 months). A total of 19 patients had gastric or peritoneal recurrence; 6 (15.4 %) in the non-EUS-FNA group vs. 13 (7.7 %) in the EUS-FNA group (P=0.21). Three patients had recurrence in the stomach wall: one (2.6 %) patient in the non-EUS-FNA group vs. two patients (1.2 %) in EUS-FNA group (P=0.46). A total of 16 patients had peritoneal recurrence: 5 patients (12.8 %) in the non-EUS-FNA group and 11 patients (6.5 %) in the EUS-FNA group (P=0.19). In a multivariate analysis, undergoing EUS-FNA was not associated with increased cancer recurrence or decreased overall survival. Conclusion: Pre-operative EUS-FNA was not associated with an increased rate of gastric or peritoneal cancer recurrence in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Two patients had gastric wall recurrence following the procedure, but this may be explained by direct tumor extension. This suggests that EUS-FNA is not associated with an increased risk of needle track seeding.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A case of EUS-guided FNA-related pancreatic cancer metastasis to the stomach [J].
Ahmed, Kashif ;
Sussman, Jeffrey J. ;
Wang, Jiang ;
Schmulewitz, Nathan .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (01) :231-233
[2]   Outcomes after preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsy in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy [J].
Beane, Joal D. ;
House, Michael G. ;
Cote, Gregory A. ;
DeWitt, John M. ;
Al-Haddad, Mohammad ;
LeBlanc, Julia K. ;
McHenry, Lee ;
Sherman, Stuart ;
Schmidt, C. Max ;
Zyromski, Nicholas J. ;
Nakeeb, Attila ;
Pitt, Henry A. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. .
SURGERY, 2011, 150 (04) :844-851
[3]   Tumor seeding after EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tail neoplasia [J].
Chong, Andre ;
Venugopal, Kannan ;
Segarajasingam, Dev ;
Lisewski, Dean .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (04) :933-935
[4]   EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis [J].
Hewitt, Michael Jonathan ;
McPhail, Mark J. W. ;
Possamai, Lucia ;
Dhar, Ameet ;
Vlavianos, Panagiotis ;
Monahan, Kevin J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (02) :319-331
[5]   Case of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in which endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy caused dissemination [J].
Hirooka, Y ;
Goto, H ;
Itoh, A ;
Hashimoto, S ;
Niwa, K ;
Ishikawa, H ;
Okada, N ;
Itoh, T ;
Kawashima, H .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 18 (11) :1323-1324
[6]   SIGNIFICANCE OF PERITONEAL CYTOLOGY IN PATIENTS WITH POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREATIC HEAD [J].
LEACH, SD ;
ROSE, JA ;
LOWY, AM ;
LEE, JE ;
CHARNSANGAVEJ, C ;
ABBRUZZESE, JL ;
KATZ, RL ;
EVANS, DB .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (03) :472-478
[7]   Prospective Cytological Assessment of Gastrointestinal Luminal Fluid Acquired During EUS: A Potential Source of False-Positive FNA and Needle Tract Seeding [J].
Levy, Michael J. ;
Gleeson, Ferga C. ;
Campion, Michael B. ;
Caudill, Jill L. ;
Clain, Jonathan E. ;
Halling, Kevin ;
Rajan, Elizabeth ;
Topazian, Mark D. ;
Wang, Kenneth K. ;
Wiersema, Maurits J. ;
Clayton, Amy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 (06) :1311-1318
[8]   Positive peritoneal cytology predicts unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Merchant, NB ;
Conlon, KC ;
Saigo, P ;
Dougherty, E ;
Brennan, MF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 188 (04) :421-426
[9]  
Meszoely IM, 2004, AM SURGEON, V70, P208
[10]   Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA [J].
Micames, C ;
Jowell, PS ;
White, R ;
Paulson, E ;
Nelson, R ;
Morse, M ;
Hurwitz, H ;
Pappas, T ;
Tyler, D ;
McGrath, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (05) :690-695