RACIAL DISPARITY IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TRIAGE

被引:93
作者
Schrader, Chet D. [1 ]
Lewis, Lawrence M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Emergency Med, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
racial disparity; ED triage; EARLY WARNING SCORE; SEVERITY INDEX; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; MORTALITY; ADMISSION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.05.010
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Previous reports of lower triage acuity scores and longer Emergency Department (ED) wait times for African Americans compared to Caucasians had insufficient information to determine if this was due to bias or appropriately based on medical history and clinical presentation. Objective: (1) Determine if African Americans are assigned lower triage acuity scores (TAS) after adjusting for a number of demographic and clinical variables likely to affect triage scores. (2) Determine if lower TAS translate into clinically significant longer wait times to assignment to a treatment area. Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort design analysis of de-identified data extracted from the ED electronic medical record system, which included demographic and clinical information, as well as TAS, and ED process times. Triage scores were assigned using a 5-point scale (ESI), with 1 being most urgent and 5 being least urgent. Mean TAS and wait times to a treatment area for specific chief complaints were compared by race; after adjusting for age, gender, insurance status, time of day, day of week, presence of co-morbidities, and abnormal vital signs using a 1:1 matched case analysis. Results: The overall mean TAS for African Americans was 2.97 vs. 2.81 for Caucasians (difference of 0.18; p < 0.001), translating to a lower acuity rating. African Americans had a significantly longer wait time to a treatment area compared to case-matched Caucasians (10.9 min; p < 0.001), with much larger differences in wait times noted within certain specific chief complaint categories. Conclusion: Our current study supports the hypothesis that racial bias may influence the triage process. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 518
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Hospital based emergency care: At the breaking point
[2]   Effects of a Triage Process Conversion on the Triage of High-risk Presentations [J].
Asaro, Phillip V. ;
Lewis, Lawrence M. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (10) :916-922
[3]   Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: Validity and survival with the Emergency Severity Index [J].
Baumann, Michael R. ;
Strout, Tania D. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (02) :234-240
[4]   Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: Interrater agreement [J].
Beveridge, R ;
Ducharme, J ;
Janes, L ;
Beaulieu, S ;
Walter, S .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) :155-159
[5]   Crisis in US emergency departments [J].
Brooks, J. R. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 175 (05) :464-464
[6]   Modified early warning score predicts the need for hospital admission and inhospital mortality [J].
Burch, V. C. ;
Tarr, G. ;
Morroni, C. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (10) :674-678
[7]  
Cherry DK, 2003, ADV DATA, V11, P337
[8]  
CNN, TAP SHOWS WOM DYING
[9]  
Cox L., 2008, ER DEATH POINTS GROW
[10]  
Gilboy N, 2005, EMERGENCY SEVERITY I