Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability

被引:89
作者
Zhao, Haoran [1 ]
Guo, Sen [1 ]
Zhao, Huiru [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 2 Beinong Rd, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Eco-industrial parks; Comprehensive benefit evaluation; Best-worst method (BWM); Circular economy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ECOLOGY; CHINA; PERFORMANCE; SYMBIOSIS; EMERGY; INDICATORS; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; TAIWAN;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-017-9936-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At the aim of solving the increasing conflicts among the economic growth, resource shortage, and environmental aggravation, the eco-industrial park becomes a significant research issue to achieve sustainable development and circular economy. Therefore, evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks and providing references and policy formulation in supporting the improvement of construction and management level for eco-industrial parks are of great significance. In this paper, a hybrid framework was proposed to assess the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks in terms of circular economy and sustainability. Firstly, the evaluation index system was constructed by using grey-Delphi method, which included economic benefit criteria, social benefit criteria, and environmental benefit criteria with nine quantitative sub-criteria and four qualitative sub-criteria. Then, a new comparison-based method, namely the best-worst method, was employed to determine the weights of all sub-criteria and the performance values of all selected eco-industrial parks with respect to the qualitative sub-criteria. Finally, five selected representative eco-industrial parks in China were ranked in terms of comprehensive benefit, and the optimal eco-industrial park was selected. According to the results of comprehensive benefit evaluation for eco-industrial parks, the strengths and weaknesses of each eco-industrial park were obvious. At the end, the recommendations for the effective and rapid development of eco-industrial parks were formulated.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1253
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Effects of Inactivated Bordetella pertussis on Phosphodiesterase in the Lung of Ovalbumin Sensitized and Challenged Rats [J].
Wang, Ya-Juan ;
Song, Shun-De ;
Chen, Jun-Chun ;
Wang, Xue-Feng ;
Jiang, Ya-Li ;
Xie, Qiang-Min ;
Chen, Ji-Qiang ;
Li, Zi-Gang ;
Tang, Hui-Fang .
PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
[42]   The evaluation of financial performance for Taiwan container shipping companies by fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Wang, Yu-Jie .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 22 :28-35
[43]   Grey relational analysis model for dynamic hybrid multiple attribute decision making [J].
Wei, Guiwu .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2011, 24 (05) :672-679
[44]  
Xie Xue-bin, 2007, Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science), V34, P16
[45]   Evaluating the Economic Performance of High-Technology Industry and Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of Science Parks in Taiwan [J].
Yan, Min-Ren ;
Chien, Kuo-Ming .
ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (02) :973-987
[46]   An extended TOPSIS model based on the Possibility theory under fuzzy environment [J].
Ye, Fei ;
Li, Yina .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 67 :263-269
[47]   Which is more cost-effective? A comparison of two wastewater treatment models in China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park, China [J].
Yuan, Zengwei ;
Zhang, Ling ;
Bi, Jun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (13) :1270-1275
[48]   Eco-industrial parks: national pilot practices in China [J].
Zhang, Ling ;
Yuan, Zengwei ;
Bi, Jun ;
Zhang, Bing ;
Liu, Beibei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (05) :504-509
[49]   Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks by employing multi -criteria decision making approach for circular economy [J].
Zhao, Haoran ;
Zhao, Huiru ;
Guo, Sen .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :2262-2276
[50]   A method for controlling enterprises access to an eco-industrial park [J].
Zhu, Li ;
Zhou, Jianren ;
Cui, Zhaojie ;
Liu, Lei .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (20) :4817-4825