Exploring attitudes about developing cancer among patients with pre-existing mobility disability

被引:1
作者
Agaronnik, Nicole D. [1 ]
El-Jawahri, Areej [2 ,3 ]
Iezzoni, Lisa I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Mongan Inst, Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Hematol & Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
cancer; health services; health services for persons with disabilities; healthcare disparities; mobility limitation; oncology; psycho‐ qualitative research; BREAST-CANCER; MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES; WOMEN; DIAGNOSIS; STAGE; CARE; MAMMOGRAPHY; DISPARITIES; PHYSICIANS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/pon.5574
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Mobility disability affects approximately 13.7% of the United States population, representing the most common disability type. People with mobility disability experience disparities in cancer screening and higher prevalence of some cancers compared to the general population. We sought to explore the attitudes of people with pre-existing mobility disability about their cancer diagnosis. Methods We conducted open-ended individual interviews with 20 participants who had pre-existing mobility disability requiring use of an assistive device or assistance with performance of activities of daily living (ADLs), subsequently diagnosed with cancer (excluding skin cancers). Interviews reached data saturation and were transcribed verbatim for conventional content analysis. Results Concerns coalesced around three major themes: sense of control over health conditions, seeking support, and recommendations for other people with disability seeking cancer care. Some participants described feeling a loss of control over their cancer diagnosis that they did not have regarding disability, while others suggested that disability presented greater challenges than their cancer diagnosis. Participants described seeking various forms of support, including emotional support (e.g., from friends and family), informational support (e.g., recommendations for seeking care), instrumental support (e.g., ADLs), and appraisal (e.g., self-reflection of personal qualities for fighting cancer). They provided recommendations, highlighting importance of self-advocacy and being attuned to changes in health status. Conclusions We found that people with pre-existing mobility disability and cancer express complex attitudes towards their cancer diagnosis. Findings may inform efforts to improve quality of relevant supports to meet the psychosocial needs of this population.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 484
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Exploring issues relating to disability cultural competence among practicing physicians [J].
Agaronnik, Nicole ;
Campbell, Eric G. ;
Ressalam, Julie ;
Iezzoni, Lisa I. .
DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 12 (03) :403-410
[2]   Challenges of Developing a Natural Language Processing Method With Electronic Health Records to Identify Persons With Chronic Mobility Disability [J].
Agaronnik, Nicole D. ;
Lindvall, Charlotta ;
El-Jawahri, Areej ;
He, Wei ;
Iezzoni, Lisa I. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 101 (10) :1739-1746
[3]   The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds [J].
Albrecht, GL ;
Devlieger, PJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (08) :977-988
[4]   Pap, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination Screening Among Women with Disabilities: A Systematic Review [J].
Andresen, Elena M. ;
Peterson-Besse, Jana J. ;
Krahn, Gloria L. ;
Walsh, Emily S. ;
Horner-Johnson, Willi ;
Iezzoni, Lisa I. .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2013, 23 (04) :E205-E214
[5]  
Barnard D., 1995, MED ETHIC S, P38
[6]  
Becker Heather, 2012, Oncol Nurs Forum, V39, pE122, DOI 10.1188/12.ONF.E122-E131
[7]   Barriers to, and facilitators of, access to cancer services and experiences of cancer care for adults with a physical disability: A mixed methods systematic review [J].
Edwards, Deborah J. ;
Sakellariou, Dikaios ;
Anstey, Sally .
DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (01)
[8]   Self-advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis [J].
Hagan, Teresa L. ;
Donovan, Heidi S. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2013, 69 (10) :2348-2359
[9]   A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research [J].
Hill, CE ;
Thompson, BJ ;
Williams, EN .
COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 25 (04) :517-572
[10]   Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J].
Hsieh, HF ;
Shannon, SE .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) :1277-1288