Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?

被引:20
作者
Asoglu, O [1 ]
Ozmen, V [1 ]
Karanlik, H [1 ]
Igci, A [1 ]
Kecer, M [1 ]
Parlak, M [1 ]
Unal, ES [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Fac Med, Med Sch, Dept Surg, TR-34750 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A | 2004年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/109264204322973844
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has replaced open cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Despite the well-accepted success of LC in chronic cholecystitis, the efficacy of this technique has been subject to some debate in acute cholecystitis (AC). This study was designed to evaluate our institution's experience with LC for AC and chronic symptomatic calculous cholecystitis (CC), based on complication and conversion rates to open surgery. Patients and Methods: The records of 1158 patients with LC from September 1991 to December 2001 were analyzed. The parameters of age, gender, early and late complication rates, and conversion rates from LC to open cholecystectomy were compared in patients with AC and CC. Results: During,the study period, LC was performed in 1158 patients. Of these, 162 patients had AC (group 1) and 996 patients had CC (group 2). The conversion rates were 4.3% (7/162) in group 1 and 2.4% (24/996) in group 2. The complication rates were not significantly different (5.6% in group 1, 5.1% in group 2, P > 0.05). Difficulty in dissection around Calot's triangle and obscure anatomy were the main reasons for conversion to conventional open surgery. The mortality rate was 1.2% in group 1 and 0.01% in group 2. Conclusion: LC appears to be a reliable, safe, and effective treatment modality for AC and CC. The surgical approach should be performed carefully because of the spectrum of potential hazards of the laparoscopic procedure. Conversion and complication rates are similar in both AC and CC groups, and improve as surgeons gain experience.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Gallstones in cirrhotics revisited by a laparoscopic view [J].
Angrisani, L ;
Lorenzo, M ;
Corcione, F ;
Vincenti, R .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1997, 7 (04) :213-220
[2]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
BARKUN, AN ;
SAMPALIS, JS ;
FRIED, G ;
TAYLOR, B ;
WEXLER, MJ ;
GORESKY, CA ;
MEAKINS, JL .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828) :1116-1119
[3]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
BARKUN, AN ;
MEAKINS, JL ;
BAILAR, J ;
BATTISTA, RN ;
BRASSARD, R ;
BRET, PM ;
FRIED, G ;
GARZON, J ;
HINCHEY, EJ ;
JOSEPH, L ;
MAMAZZA, J ;
SIGMAN, H ;
STEIN, L ;
SAMPALIS, J ;
SZEGO, PL ;
TAYLOR, B ;
WEXLER, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :455-458
[4]  
CAMERON JL, 1991, ANN SURG, V213, P1
[5]  
CANTWELL DV, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P483
[6]   Conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Evolution from 1993 and current state [J].
Capizzi, FD ;
Fogli, L ;
Brulatti, M ;
Boschi, S ;
Di Domenico, M ;
Papa, V ;
Patrizi, P .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2003, 13 (02) :89-91
[7]   How do bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy differ from those during open cholecystectomy? [J].
Chaudhary, A ;
Manisegran, M ;
Chandra, A ;
Agarwal, AK ;
Sachdev, AK .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2001, 11 (04) :187-191
[8]  
Chow S, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P1839
[9]   THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
CUSCHIERI, A ;
DUBOIS, F ;
MOUIEL, J ;
MOURET, P ;
BECKER, H ;
BUESS, G ;
TREDE, M ;
TROIDL, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :385-387
[10]   MECHANISMS OF MAJOR BILIARY INJURY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
DAVIDOFF, AM ;
PAPPAS, TN ;
MURRAY, EA ;
HILLEREN, DJ ;
JOHNSON, RD ;
BAKER, ME ;
NEWMAN, GE ;
COTTON, PB ;
MEYERS, WC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (03) :196-202