The undesirable effect of audit quality: Evidence from firm innovation

被引:25
|
作者
Nguyen, Lily [1 ]
Vu, Le [2 ]
Yin, Xiangkang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Finance Discipline, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Ctr Global Business, Monash Business Sch, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Deakin Business Sch, Dept Finance, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
关键词
Audit quality; Innovation; Patents; Citations; Financial reporting; Managerial myopia; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; INDUSTRY EXPERTISE; ANALYST COVERAGE; SAMPLE SELECTION; CAPITAL-MARKETS; EARNINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bar.2020.100938
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines whether and how audit quality affects a firm's technological innovation. Using a sample of 7,482 U.S. firms between 2000 and 2009, we demonstrate that high audit quality is associated with lower innovation output, measured by patent counts and patent citations. The effect remains valid after a series of tests for endogeneity issues, alternative measures of audit quality, and different subsamples. We also find that firms with high audit quality attract more non-dedicated institutional investors and financial analysts, who often exert excessive pressure on managers for short-term performance. These pressures, in turn, exacerbate managerial myopia and lead them to forgo investments in innovation. Our findings provide new insights into audit quality by showing its undesirable, most likely unintended, consequences. (C) 2020 British Accounting Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does audit quality affect firm innovation? Evidence from China
    Hsu, Charles
    Wu, Chaopeng
    Yan, Zehao
    Zhu, Ruichao
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2025, 52 (02) : 1059 - 1094
  • [2] Does audit quality affect firm innovation?
    Wang, Litan
    Qian, Minxun
    Wang, Yongzhe
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 117 : 402 - 417
  • [3] The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Audit Market
    Kwon, Soo Young
    Lim, Youngdeok
    Simnett, Roger
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (04): : 167 - 195
  • [4] Corporate Governance and Firm Innovation: Evidence from Italy
    Rossi, Fabrizio
    Lacchini, Marco
    Celenza, Domenico
    Scafarto, Vincenzo
    IFKAD 2015: 10TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: CULTURE, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CONNECTING THE KNOWLEDGE DOTS, 2015, : 2433 - 2452
  • [5] The bright side of co-opted boards: Evidence from firm innovation
    Nguyen, Lily
    Vu, Le
    Yin, Xiangkang
    FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2021, 56 (01) : 29 - 53
  • [6] Fee Discounting and Audit Quality Following Audit Firm and Audit Partner Changes: Chinese Evidence
    Huang, Hua-Wei
    Raghunandan, K.
    Huang, Ting-Chiao
    Chiou, Jeng-Ren
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (04) : 1517 - 1546
  • [7] Does News Media Affect Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets? Evidence from China
    Wang, Kun Tracy
    Zhu, Nathan Zhenghang
    Luo, Guqiang
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2024, 60 (04): : 709 - 751
  • [8] The audit quality and the audit firm' caracteristicts in Portugal
    Amaral dos Prazeres, Carlos Miguel
    Figueiredo Pais, Claudio Antonio
    2017 12TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2017,
  • [9] The effect of audit quality on transfer pricing aggressiveness and firm risk: Evidence from Southeast Asian countries
    Sari, Dewi Kartika
    Siregar, Sylvia Veronica
    Martani, Dwi
    Wondabio, Ludovicus Sensi
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [10] Regulatory intervention and audit quality: new evidence from audit firm suspension
    Feng, Zhuoan
    Li, Lina Zixuan
    Wong, Hau Yan
    Wong, Jilnaught
    MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2023, 31 (05) : 1165 - 1189