Evaluation of biofilm production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa from canine ears and the impact of biofilm on antimicrobial susceptibility in vitro

被引:45
作者
Pye, Charlotte C. [1 ]
Yu, Anthony A. [2 ]
Weese, J. Scott [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Clin Studies, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Yu Guelph Vet Dermatol, Guelph, ON N1L 1C8, Canada
[3] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Pathobiol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
RESISTANCE; OTITIS; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.1111/vde.12040
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background - Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of canine otitis; P. aeruginosa biofilm formation has been documented in human medicine, but the role of biofilms in canine disease is not well documented. Bacteria within biofilms can be more resistant to antibiotics compared with their planktonic form; therefore, understanding the biofilm-forming capacity of isolates and their susceptibility to antimicrobials is important when developing treatment regimens. Hypothesis/Objectives - To evaluate the biofilm-forming capacity of canine otic isolates of P. aeruginosa and to compare the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the planktonic versus biofilm-embedded bacteria. Methods - Biofilm-forming ability was assessed using a microtitre plate assay. Broth microdilution was used to assess the MICs of neomycin, polymyxin B, enrofloxacin and gentamicin for the planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria. Results - Eighty-three isolates from dogs with otitis were tested; 33 (40%) were classified as biofilm producers. Biofilm MICs for polymyxin B, neomycin, gentamicin and enrofloxacin were significantly higher than for the planktonic form (P < 0.05). Conclusions and clinical importance - Biofilm production by otitis isolates of P. aeruginosa is common and may play a role in the pathogenesis of disease. The MICs for biofilm-embedded bacteria differ from their planktonic counterparts, potentially leading to a lack of response to treatment. If polymyxin B, gentamicin, neomycin or enrofloxacin is to be used for topical treatment of a Pseudomonas otitis, the concentration of the medication should be increased, in particular if addressing chronic otitis, because biofilms may have developed.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / E99
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms [J].
Allesen-Holm, M ;
Barken, KB ;
Yang, L ;
Klausen, M ;
Webb, JS ;
Kjelleberg, S ;
Molin, S ;
Givskov, M ;
Tolker-Nielsen, T .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (04) :1114-1128
[2]  
Angus J.C., 2005, Small Animal Ear Diseases, P41
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, V26, P1
[4]   Direct Evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Mediators in a Chronic Infection Model [J].
Byrd, Matthew S. ;
Pang, Bing ;
Hong, Wenzhou ;
Waligora, Elizabeth A. ;
Juneau, Richard A. ;
Armbruster, Chelsie E. ;
Weimer, Kristen E. D. ;
Murrah, Kyle ;
Mann, Ethan E. ;
Lu, Haiping ;
Sprinkle, April ;
Parsek, Matthew R. ;
Kock, Nancy D. ;
Wozniak, Daniel J. ;
Swords, W. Edward .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2011, 79 (08) :3087-3095
[5]   SadB is required for the transition from reversible to irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 [J].
Caiazza, NC ;
O'Toole, GA .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2004, 186 (14) :4476-4485
[6]   The Calgary Biofilm Device: New technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms [J].
Ceri, H ;
Olson, ME ;
Stremick, C ;
Read, RR ;
Morck, D ;
Buret, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (06) :1771-1776
[7]   Biofilms and their relevance to veterinary medicine [J].
Clutterbuck, A. L. ;
Woods, E. J. ;
Knottenbelt, D. C. ;
Clegg, P. D. ;
Cochrane, C. A. ;
Percival, S. L. .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 121 (1-2) :1-17
[8]  
Cole LK, 1998, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V212, P534
[9]   Introduction to biofilm [J].
Costerton, JW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (3-4) :217-221
[10]   Measuring Antimicrobial Activity Against Biofilm Bacteria [J].
J. Curtin ;
M. Cormican .
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2003, 2 (2-4) :285-291