Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms

被引:200
作者
Gayen, Amiya [1 ]
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza [2 ,3 ]
Saha, Sunil [1 ]
Keesstra, Saskia [4 ,5 ]
Bai, Shibiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gour Banga, Dept Geog, Malda, W Bengal, India
[2] Nanjing Normal Univ, Coll Marine Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Shiraz Univ, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Engn, Coll Agr, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Wageningen Environm Res, Team Soil Water & Land Use, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Newcastle, Civil Surveying & Environm Engn, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gully erosion; Flexible discriminant analysis; Multivariate additive regression splines; Support vector machine; Random forest; Geospatial modelling; ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DATA-MINING TECHNIQUES; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SOIL-EROSION; CONDITIONAL-PROBABILITY; GOLESTAN PROVINCE; FREQUENCY RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.436
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gully erosion is one of the most effective drivers of sediment removal and runoff from highland areas to valley floors and stable channels, where continued off-site effects of water erosion occur. Gully initiation and development is a natural process that greatly impacts natural resources, agricultural activities, and environmental quality as it promotes land and water degradation, ecosystem disruption, and intensification of hazards. In this research, an attempt is made to produce gully erosion susceptibility maps for the management of hazard-prone areas in the Pathro River Basin of India using four well-known machine learning models, namely, multivariate additive regression splines (MARS), flexible discriminant analysis (FDA), random forest ( RF), and support vector machine (SVM). To support this effort, observations from 174 gully erosion sites were made using field surveys. Of the 174 observations, 70% were randomly split into a training data set to build susceptibility models and the remaining 30% were used to validate the newly built models. Twelve gully erosion conditioning factors were assessed to find the areas most susceptible to gully erosion. The predisposing factors were slope gradient, altitude, plan curvature, slope aspect, land use, slope length (LS), topographical wetness index (TWI), drainage density, soil type, distance from the river, distance from the lineament, and distance from the road. Finally, the results from the four applied models were validated with the help of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curves. The AUC value for the RF model was calculated to be 96.2%, whereas for those for the FDA, MARS, and SVM models were 842%, 91.4%, and 88.3%, respectively. The AUC results indicated that the random forest model had the highest prediction accuracy, followed by the MARS, SVM, and FDA models. However, it could be concluded that all the machine learning models performed well according to their prediction accuracy. The produced GESMs can be very useful for land managers and policy makers as they can be used to initiate remedial measures and erosion hazard mitigation in prioritized areas. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 138
页数:15
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Prioritization of effective factors in the occurrence of land subsidence and its susceptibility mapping using an SVM model and their different kernel functions
    Abdollahi, Sahar
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Ghanbarian, Gholam Abbas
    Safaeian, Roja
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 78 (06) : 4017 - 4034
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, Landforms Analysis
  • [3] Spatial modelling of gully erosion using evidential belief function, logistic regression, and a new ensemble of evidential belief function-logistic regression algorithm
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Rezaei, Khalil
    Yamani, Mojtaba
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Lombardo, Luigi
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 29 (11) : 4035 - 4049
  • [4] Classification of Hyperspectral Images With Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis
    Bandos, Tatyana V.
    Bruzzone, Lorenzo
    Camps-Valls, Gustavo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 47 (03): : 862 - 873
  • [5] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [6] Using multiple adaptive regression splines to support decision making in code inspections
    Briand, LC
    Freimut, B
    Vollei, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2004, 73 (02) : 205 - 217
  • [7] Assessing spatial uncertainty in mapping soil erodibility factor using geostatistical stochastic simulation
    Buttafuoco, G.
    Conforti, M.
    Aucelli, P. P. C.
    Robustelli, G.
    Scarciglia, F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 66 (04) : 1111 - 1125
  • [8] Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues
    Catani, F.
    Lagomarsino, D.
    Segoni, S.
    Tofani, V.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (11) : 2815 - 2831
  • [9] Impact of terrain attributes, parent material and soil types on gully erosion
    Chaplot, Vincent
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2013, 186 : 1 - 11
  • [10] Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework
    Chen, XW
    Liu, M
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (24) : 4394 - 4400