Crown dimensions and proximal enamel thickness of mandibular second bicuspids

被引:13
作者
Fernandes, Sergio Augusto [1 ]
Vellini-Ferreira, Flavio [1 ]
Scavone-Junior, Helio [1 ]
Ferreira, Rivea Ines [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo City UNICID, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Bicuspid; Tooth Crown; Dental Enamel; Orthodontics; CARIES RISK; MESIODISTAL; REDUCTION; DENTITION;
D O I
10.1590/S1806-83242011000400008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
To achieve proper recontouring of anterior and posterior teeth, to obtain optimal morphology during enamel stripping, it is important to be aware of dental anatomy. This study aimed at evaluating crown dimensions and proximal enamel thickness in a sample of 40 extracted sound, human, mandibular, second bicuspids (20 right and 20 left). Mesiodistal, cervico-occlusal and buccolingual crown dimensions were measured using a digital caliper, accurate to 0.01 mm. Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and cut along their long axes through the proximal surfaces to obtain 0.7 mm-thick central sections. Enamel thickness on the cut sections was measured using a perfilometer. Comparative analyses were carried out using the Student's-t test (alpha = 5%). The mean mesiodistal crown widths for right and left teeth were 7.79 mm (+/- 0.47) and 7.70 mm (+/- 0.51), respectively. Mean cervico-occlusal heights ranged from 8.31 mm (+/- 0.75) on the right to 8.38 mm (+/- 0.85) on the left teeth. The mean values for the buccolingual dimension were 8.67 mm (+/- 0.70) on the right and 8.65 mm (+/- 0.54) on the left teeth. The mean enamel thickness on the mesial surfaces ranged from 1.35 mm (+/- 0.22) to 1.40 mm (+/- 0.17), on the left and right sides, respectively. On the distal surfaces, the corresponding values were 1.44 mm (+/- 0.21) and 1.46 mm (+/- 0.12). No significant differences were found between measurements for right and left teeth. However, enamel thickness was significantly greater on the distal surfaces, compared with the mesial surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 330
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Ballard M., 1944, ANGLE ORTHOD, V14, P67
[3]   COMPARISONS OF MESIODISTAL AND BUCCOLINGUAL CROWN DIMENSIONS OF THE PERMANENT TEETH IN 3 POPULATIONS FROM EGYPT, MEXICO, AND THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
JAKOBSEN, JR ;
ABDALLAH, EM ;
GARCIA, AF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1989, 96 (05) :416-422
[4]  
Chudasama Dipak, 2007, J Clin Orthod, V41, P315
[5]  
Demange C, 1990, J Clin Orthod, V24, P408
[6]   A BIOMETRIC STUDY OF TOOTH SIZE AND DENTAL CROWDING [J].
DORIS, JM ;
BERNARD, BW ;
KUFTINEC, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1981, 79 (03) :326-336
[7]   Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients [J].
Germec, Derya ;
Taner, Tulin Ugur .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (04) :539-549
[8]   ANALYSIS OF THE IRAQI DENTITION - MESIODISTAL CROWN DIAMETERS OF PERMANENT TEETH [J].
GHOSE, LJ ;
BAGHDADY, VS .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 (03) :1047-1054
[9]   A radiographic assessment of enamel thickness in human maxillary incisors [J].
Harris, EF ;
Hicks, JD .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10) :825-831
[10]   Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction [J].
Jarjoura, Karim ;
Gagnon, Genevieve ;
Nieberg, Lewis .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (01) :26-30