Efficient Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Automated Vehicles

被引:10
作者
Yu, Shuyou [1 ,2 ]
Sheng, Encong [2 ]
Zhang, Yajing [2 ]
Li, Yongfu [3 ]
Chen, Hong [2 ,4 ]
Hao, Yi [5 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, State Key Lab Automot Simulat & Control, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Dept Control Sci & Engn, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Dept Automat, Chongqing 400065, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Coll Elect & Informat Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[5] Dongfeng Motor Corp, Dongfeng Commercial Vehicle Technol Ctr, Wuhan 442001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
automated vehicle control; nonlinear model predictive control; Koopman operator; data-driven control; KOOPMAN OPERATOR; DECOMPOSITION; SYSTEMS; TRACKING;
D O I
10.3390/math10214163
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this paper, an efficient model predictive control (MPC) of velocity tracking of automated vehicles is proposed, in which a reference signal is given a priori. Five degree-of-freedom vehicle dynamics with nonlinear tires is chosen as the prediction model, in which coupling characteristics of longitudinal and lateral dynamics are taken into account. In order to balance computational burden and prediction accuracy, Koopman operator theory is adopted to transform the nonlinear model into a global linear model. Then, the global linear model is used in the design of MPC to reduce online computational burden and avoid solving nonconvex/nonlinear optimization problems. Furthermore, the effectiveness of Koopman operator in vehicle dynamics control is verified using a Matlab/Simulink environment. Validation results demonstrate that dynamic mode decomposition with control (DMDc) and extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDMD) algorithms are more accurate in model validation and dynamic prediction than local linearization, and DMDc algorithm has less computational burden on solving optimization problems than the EDMD algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Chatzikomis CI, 2009, FORSCH INGENIEURWES, V73, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10010-009-0112-5
[2]   Predictive Sliding Mode Control using Feedback Linearization for Hypersonic Vehicle [J].
Cheng, Xianlei ;
Wang, Peng ;
Liu, Luhua ;
Tang, Guojian .
2014 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, APISAT2014, 2015, 99 :1076-1081
[3]  
Cibulka V., 2022, ARXIV
[4]  
Cibulka V, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS CONTROL (PC19), P167, DOI [10.1109/pc.2019.8815104, 10.1109/PC.2019.8815104]
[5]   Autonomous vehicle positioning with GPS in urban canyon environments [J].
Cui, YJ ;
Ge, SZS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2003, 19 (01) :15-25
[6]   Velocity Control Strategies to Improve Automated Vehicle Driving Comfort [J].
Du, Yuchuan ;
Liu, Chenglong ;
Li, Yishun .
IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2018, 10 (01) :8-18
[7]   qpOASES: a parametric active-set algorithm for quadratic programming [J].
Ferreau, Hans Joachim ;
Kirches, Christian ;
Potschka, Andreas ;
Bock, Hans Georg ;
Diehl, Moritz .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION, 2014, 6 (04) :327-363
[8]  
Gao J, 2017, P AMER CONTR CONF, P4454, DOI 10.23919/ACC.2017.7963641
[9]   Linearization of the lateral dynamics reference model for the motion control of vehicles [J].
Gidlewski, Miroslaw ;
Zardecki, Dariusz .
MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 82 :49-54
[10]   Control of connected and automated vehicles: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Guanetti, Jacopo ;
Kim, Yeojun ;
Borrelli, Francesco .
ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2018, 45 :18-40