Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD

被引:322
作者
Papakostas, George I. [1 ]
Fava, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Antidepressant; Placebo; Major; Depressive; Disorder; Adults; DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE; MONTGOMERY-ASBERG; RELATIVE SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA; MAJOR DEPRESSION; RUN-IN; DISORDERS; SEVERITY; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.08.009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Substantial and highly variable placebo response rates represent a major obstacle to antidepressant development in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, whether the likelihood of receiving active treatment or placebo, a proxy of the degree of expectation of improvement, may itself influence clinical trial outcome is unclear. The goal of this work was to examine whether the probability of receiving placebo influences clinical trial outcome antidepressant MDD trials. Medline/Pubmed publication databases were searched for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for adults with MDD. 146 manuscripts involving 182 clinical trials were pooled (n = 36,385). Pooled response rates for drug and placebo were 53.8% and 37.3%. A meta-regression (random-effects) established that the probability of receiving placebo, year of publication, and baseline severity were independent predictors of the risk ratio of responding to antidepressants versus placebo. Specifically, a greater probability of receiving placebo, greater baseline severity and an earlier year of publication predicted greater antidepressant-placebo "efficacy separation". Fixed versus flexible dose design, trial duration and population age did not influence clinical trial outcome. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1994, DSM 4 DIAGN STAT MEN
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of MentalDisorders, V3rd
[3]  
Association A.P., 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Revision
[4]   The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: A comparison of measures [J].
Carmody, Thomas J. ;
Rush, A. John ;
Bernstein, Ira ;
Warden, Diane ;
Brannan, Stephen ;
Burnham, Daniel ;
Woo, Ada ;
Trivedi, Madhukar H. .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 16 (08) :601-611
[5]   The responsiveness of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [J].
Faries, D ;
Herrera, J ;
Rayamajhi, J ;
DeBrota, D ;
Demitrack, M ;
Potter, WZ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (01) :3-10
[6]   The double-blind variable placebo lead-in period: Results from two antidepressant clinical trials [J].
Faries, DE ;
Heiligenstein, JH ;
Tollefson, GD ;
Potter, WZ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 21 (06) :561-568
[7]   The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: Culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach [J].
Fava, M ;
Evins, AE ;
Dorer, DJ ;
Schoenfeld, DA .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2003, 72 (03) :115-127
[8]   DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR USE IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
FEIGHNER, JP ;
WOODRUFF, RA ;
WINOKUR, G ;
MUNOZ, R ;
ROBINS, E ;
GUZE, SB .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1972, 26 (01) :57-&
[9]  
GUY W, DHEW PUB
[10]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62