The Role of Government in Protecting the Environment: Quality of Government and the Translation of Normative Views about Government Responsibility into Spending Preferences

被引:65
作者
Kulin, Joakim [1 ]
Seva, Ingemar Johansson [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Environmental protection; government responsibility; ISSP; quality of government (QoG); spending attitudes; PUBLIC SUPPORT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; TRUST; CORRUPTION; ATTITUDES; SUSTAINABILITY; POLARIZATION; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/00207659.2019.1582964
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
While it is becoming increasingly evident that environmental problems such as climate change and global warming constitute existential threats to human societies, these problems will very likely persist and even intensify unless governments enact effective and potentially costly environmental policies. However, government policies and spending ultimately rely on public support, thus underscoring the need to increase present knowledge about the processes underlying citizens' policy attitudes. In this study, we focus on the relationship between citizens' normative views about government responsibility and their support for government spending on the environment While people who think that, as a general principle, it ought to be the government's responsibility to protect the environment should be more likely to support increasing government spending on the environment, we argue that this relationship is dependent on the quality of government. Using multilevel analysis and data from the most recent ISSP "Role of Government" module, we show that people who think that it is the government's responsibility to protect the environment are more likely to support increasing government spending on the environment in countries where government institutions are fair, effective, and non-corrupt. This suggests that the role of government in protecting the environment stretches far beyond designing effective environmental policies, since an overall ineffective and corrupt government appears to undermine public support for critical environmental policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 129
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/su9050679
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, QUALITY GOVT CORRUPT, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226729589.001.0001
[3]   Willing to pay to save the planet? Evaluating support for increased spending on sustainable development and environmentally friendly policies in five countries [J].
Arpad, Todor .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11)
[4]   Measuring the immeasurable -: A survey of sustainability indices [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Jochem, Patrick E. P. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (01) :1-8
[5]   Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale [J].
Bryan, Mark L. ;
Jenkins, Stephen P. .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2016, 32 (01) :3-22
[6]   The politics of climate change in the UK [J].
Carter, Neil .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (03) :423-433
[7]  
Charron N, 2018, BRIDGING THE PROSPERITY GAP IN THE EU: THE SOCIAL CHALLENGE AHEAD, P220
[8]   Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern [J].
Dietz, T ;
Stern, PC ;
Guagnano, GA .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (04) :450-471
[9]  
Dunlap R.E., 2001, Environmental Politics, V10, P23, DOI [10.1080/714000580, DOI 10.1080/714000580]
[10]  
Dunlap RileyE., 1975, Environment and Behavior, V7, P428, DOI DOI 10.1177/001391657500700402