Reconstruction of the frontoorbital frame using split-thickness calvarial bone grafts

被引:8
作者
Hendus, J [1 ]
Draf, W [1 ]
Bockmühl, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Akad Lehrkrankenhaus, Klinikum Fulda gAG,Kommunikationsstorungen, Klin Hals Nasen Ohrenkrankheiten Kopf Hals & Plas, D-36043 Fulda, Germany
关键词
autogenous bone grafts; split calvarial bone; reconstructive surgery; craniofacial defects;
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-870564
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: There are many autogenous and allogenous grafts as well as alloplastic materials available for the reconstruction of craniofacial bony frame. We review our techniques and describe the advantages of using calvarial bone, especially split-thickness grafts for bone reconstruction in this area. Patients and Methods: Between 1996 and 2003 the orbitocranial bony frames of 15 patients were reconstructed using split calvarial bone grafts at the ENT-Department of the Hospital Fulda gAG. In 12 patients the anterior frontal sinus wall or the entire Os frontale were affected. In 1 patient each the lateral wall, roof and floor of the orbit had to be reconstructed. The causes of the bone defects were trauma (n = 6), recurrent frontal sinusitis partly with osteomyelitis (n = 4), benigne tumors (n = 2) and malignancies (n = 3). Twelve patients have had multiple previous operations. In 3 patients the bone reconstruction was performed in the same operation as the tumor removal. Within the follow-up period between 2 and 8 years the split calvarial bone grafts remained stable in size and shape. Graft rejection, osteomyelitis or bone resorption did not occur. Furthermore, we have not experienced significant complications in harvesting cranial bone and have not seen major donor site morbidity. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that split-thickness calvarial bone is an excellent graft not only for facial and forehead contouring but also for orbital and complex craniofacial reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 904
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ZBL CHIR LEIPZIG
[2]  
Berghaus A, 1992, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl, V1, P53
[3]  
Bockmühl U, 2005, FRONTAL SINUS, P281, DOI 10.1007/3-540-27607-6_31
[4]  
CANELLA DM, 1990, J ORAL MAXILLOFAC SU, V48, P741
[5]   EN-BLOC FOREHEAD RECONSTRUCTION WITH SPLIT-THICKNESS CRANIAL BONE [J].
ELISEVICH, K ;
BITE, U .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1991, 35 (05) :384-388
[6]   SPLIT-THICKNESS BONE-GRAFTS IN COMPLEX CRANIOFACIAL RECONSTRUCTIONS [J].
GOODRICH, JT ;
ARGAMASO, R ;
HALL, CD .
PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 18 (04) :195-201
[7]  
Grundmann T, 2004, HNO, V52, P57, DOI 10.1007/s00106-003-0840-z
[8]   EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF CALVARIAL BONE-GRAFTS IN ORBITAL RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ILANKOVAN, V ;
JACKSON, IT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1992, 30 (02) :92-96
[9]   SKULL BONE-GRAFTS IN MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY [J].
JACKSON, IT ;
HELDEN, G ;
MARX, R .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1986, 44 (12) :949-955
[10]   Functional and esthetic results after osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy and frontal contour reconstruction using bicoronal incision [J].
Kausch I. ;
Handrock M. .
HNO, 2000, 48 (10) :735-742