Macro and Structural Effects of Carbon Tax in China Based on the ECGE Model

被引:3
作者
Wu, Qunli [1 ]
Li, Chunxiang [2 ]
Zhang, Hongjie [2 ]
Tian, Jinyu [2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Key Lab Low Carbon Dev & Elect Power Renewable En, Baoding, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Baoding, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2019年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
carbon tax; ECGE model; macro effect; structural effect; China; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; ENERGY TAX; CGE MODEL; PERFORMANCE; TAXATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/90788
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid economic development has brought great pressure to China. Carbon tax could be an ideal economic tool to cope with the environmental pressure. The implementation of carbon tax will exert an influence on the national and sectoral economies as well as reduction. However, few researchers have focused on the carbon tax effect at the sectoral level. Based on SAM 2012, this study develops an ECGE model consisting of the environment module. Then the macro and structural effects of carbon tax are simulated at tax rates of 10-100 yuan/t CO2 in China. Simulation results show that compared with the baseline: 1) Carbon tax has a mild strike on the GDP of China and is effective at reducing emissions. Furthermore, we found that a carbon tax rate of 70 yuan/t CO2 may be an appropriate rate to achieve the Chinese reduction target of carbon intensity in the year 2020. 2) Carbon tax induces an output shrinkage in energy or high-energy-consuming industries by 0.95-7.65%, while there is a slight increase in low-energy-consuming industries. The mining and washing of coal industry (coal) experiences the largest decrease in CO2 emissions and the light industry (lindus) experiences the sharpest decline in carbon intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2463
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: A computable general equilibrium analysis [J].
Allan, Grant ;
Lecca, Patrizio ;
McGregor, Peter ;
Swales, Kim .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 100 :40-50
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CHIN STAT YB
[3]  
[Anonymous], IMF STAFF PAP
[4]   A UK CARBON ENERGY TAX - THE MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS [J].
BARKER, T ;
BAYLIS, S ;
MADSEN, P .
ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (03) :296-308
[5]   Carbon policy in a high-growth economy: The case of China [J].
Bretschger, Lucas ;
Zhang, Lin .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 47 :1-19
[6]   Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax [J].
Bristow, Abigail L. ;
Wardman, Mark ;
Zanni, Alberto M. ;
Chintakayala, Phani K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) :1824-1837
[7]   Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? [J].
Bruvoll, A ;
Larsen, BM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (04) :493-505
[8]  
CRISTIAN M., 2018, ENERG POLICY, V114, P262
[9]   On the impacts of carbon tax and technological progress on China [J].
Dong, Baomin ;
Wei, Weixian ;
Ma, Xili ;
Li, Peng .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (04) :389-406
[10]   The impacts of carbon tax on energy intensity and economic growth - A dynamic evolution analysis on the case of China [J].
Fang, Guochang ;
Tian, Lixin ;
Fu, Min ;
Sun, Mei .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 110 :17-28