Reliability analysis of series systems with multiple failure modes under epistemic and aleatory uncertainties

被引:15
作者
Xiao, N-C [1 ]
Huang, H-Z [1 ]
Wang, Z. [1 ]
Li, Y. [1 ]
Liu, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Mechatron Engn, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiple failure modes; reliability analysis; epistemic uncertainty; aleatory uncertainty; series systems; PROBABILITY; DESIGN; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1177/1748006X11421266
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Uncertainty exists widely in engineering practice. An engineering system may have multiple failure criteria. In the current paper, system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes under both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties is presented. Epistemic uncertainty is modelled using p-boxes, while aleatory uncertainty is modelled using probability distributions. A first-order reliability method is developed and non-linear performance functions are linearized by the sampling method instead of the commonly used Taylor's expansion at the most probable point. Furthermore, multiple failure modes in a system are often correlated because they depend on the same uncertain variables. In order to consider these correlated failure modes, the methods proposed by Feng and Frank are extended in this paper in order to calculate the joint probability of failure for two arbitrary failure modes under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. The Pearson correlation coefficient of two arbitrary failure modes is determined by the sampling method. Since two types of uncertainty exist in the system, the probability of system failure is an interval rather than a point value. The probability of failure of the system can be obtained by the combination of the extension 'narrow' bound method and the interval arithmetic. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 304
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Melchers RE., 1987, Structural reliability analysis and prediction
[22]   A design optimization method using evidence theory [J].
Mourelatos, Zissimos P. ;
Zhou, Jun .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2006, 128 (04) :901-908
[23]   Reliability estimation and design with insufficient data based on possibility theory [J].
Mourelatos, ZP ;
Zhou, J .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (08) :1696-1705
[24]   Adaptation of fast Fourier transformations to estimate structural failure probability [J].
Penmetsa, RC ;
Grandhi, RV .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2003, 39 (5-6) :473-485
[25]   Structural system reliability quantification using multipoint function approximations [J].
Penmetsa, RC ;
Grandhi, RV .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (12) :2526-2531
[26]   Probabilistic interval reliability of structural systems [J].
Qiu, Zhiping ;
Yang, Di ;
Elishakoff, Isaac .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2008, 45 (10) :2850-2860
[27]   Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data [J].
Sankararaman, Shankar ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (07) :814-824
[28]   Fuzzy modeling of system behavior for risk and reliability analysis [J].
Sharma, Rajiv Kumar ;
Kumar, Dinesh ;
Kumar, Pradeep .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2008, 39 (06) :563-581
[29]   The basic properties of some typical systems' reliability in interval form [J].
Sun, Hai-Long ;
Yao, Wei-Xing .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (04) :364-373
[30]   Computing expectations with continuous p-boxes: Univariate case [J].
Utkin, Lev ;
Destercke, Sebastien .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2009, 50 (05) :778-798