The effect of the programs for demand response incentives in competitive electricity markets

被引:18
作者
Bompard, Ettore [1 ]
Napoli, Roberto [1 ]
Wan, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Ingn Elettr, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER | 2009年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
economic load response programs (ELRP); demand response (DR) programs; distributed energy resources (DER); time of use (TOU); IMPACTS; CONTRACTS;
D O I
10.1002/etep.265
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The special features of electricity Such as non-storability and lack of good substitutes, the network related market power and the demand inelasticity result in high volatile electricity prices in pool markets, especially during peak hours. Demand response (DR) programs with the aid of distributed energy resources (DER) provide the means to increase demand elasticity and, as a consequence, to counteract the effect of market power. This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of DR programs and try to answer to what extend DR programs will increase the demand elasticity and to what degree it will reduce the market power. Two DR programs, that is, time of use (TOU) rate and economic load response program (ELRP) are considered in this paper and the possible price responsiveness of load is modeled as linearly correlated to the difference of day and night TOU rate and the compensation price of load curtailment in order to determine the demand elasticity frontier. Game theory is employed to model the strategic bidding of generation companies (GenCos) and the Lerner index is used to quantify the market power. The proposed model is applied in Italian electricity market for numerical study, Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 139
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 2007 IEEE POW ENG SO, DOI DOI 10.1109/PES.2007.385728
[2]   Network constraint impacts on the competitive electricity markets under supply-side strategic bidding [J].
Bompard, E ;
Lu, W ;
Napoli, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (01) :160-170
[3]   Congestion-management schemes: A comparative analysis under a unified framework [J].
Bompard, E ;
Correia, P ;
Gross, G ;
Amelin, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (01) :346-352
[4]   The impacts of price responsiveness on strategic equilibrium in competitive electricity markets [J].
Bompard, Ettore ;
Ma, Yuchao ;
Napoli, Roberto ;
Abrate, Graziano ;
Ragazzi, Elena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2007, 29 (05) :397-407
[5]   The demand elasticity impacts on the strategic bidding behavior of the electricity producers [J].
Bompard, Ettore ;
Ma, Yuchao ;
Napoli, Roberto ;
Abrate, Graziano .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (01) :188-197
[6]   Multi-Agent Models for Consumer Choice and Retailer Strategies in the Competitive Electricity Market [J].
Bompard, Ettore F. ;
Abrate, Graziano ;
Napoli, Roberto ;
Wan, Bo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 8 (02)
[7]  
Borenstein S, 2002, Dynamic pricing, advanced metering and demand response in electricity markets
[8]   Oligopolistic competition in power networks: A conjectured supply function approach [J].
Day, CJ ;
Hobbs, BF ;
Pang, JS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (03) :597-607
[9]   Negotiating bilateral contracts in electricity markets [J].
El Khatib, Sameh ;
Galiana, Francisco D. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (02) :553-562
[10]   Designing incentive compatible contracts for effective demand management [J].
Fahrioglu, M ;
Alvarado, FL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (04) :1255-1260