Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load?

被引:261
作者
Cierniak, Gabriele [1 ]
Scheiter, Katharina [2 ]
Gerjets, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, D-72072 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Cognitive load theory; Split-attention effect; Spatial contiguity effect; Cognitive load measurement; Dual task; Subjective ratings; ACQUISITION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; DESIGN; SKILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The phenomenon that the physical integration of verbal and pictorial information sources, compared to their physical separation, enhances learning is known as the split-attention effect. This paper investigates how the split-attention effect can be best explained against the background of cognitive load theory. In an experimental study, students learned about physiological processes with either an integrated or a split-source format. Secondary task performance was used to measure overall cognitive load, whereas subjective ratings were used to measure intrinsic, extraneous and germane load individually. Learners with split-source format achieved lower learning outcomes, but did not show worse secondary task performance than learners with integrated format. These results contradict the assumption that only an increase in extraneous load for learners with a split-source format mediates the split-attention effect. Mediation analyses of the subjective load ratings revealed that both, extraneous and germane load contributed to the split-attention effect. These results support the assumption that germane load also plays a crucial role in mediating the split-attention effect. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 324
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]  
PURNELL KN, 1991, INSTR SCI, V20, P443
[32]   TELEVISION IS EASY AND PRINT IS TOUGH - THE DIFFERENTIAL INVESTMENT OF MENTAL EFFORT IN LEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF PERCEPTIONS AND ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
SALOMON, G .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 76 (04) :647-658
[33]   A reconsideration of cognitive load theory [J].
Schnotz, Wolfgang ;
Kuerschner, Christian .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (04) :469-508
[34]   Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Shrout, PE ;
Bolger, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :422-445
[35]  
Sobel ME., 1982, SOCIOL METHODOL, V13, P290, DOI [10.2307/270723, DOI 10.2307/270723]
[36]   Cognitive architecture and instructional design [J].
Sweller, J ;
van Merrienboer, JJG ;
Paas, FGWC .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (03) :251-296
[37]   WHY SOME MATERIAL IS DIFFICULT TO LEARN [J].
SWELLER, J ;
CHANDLER, P .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1994, 12 (03) :185-233
[38]   SOME COGNITIVE-PROCESSES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ORGANIZATION AND PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION [J].
SWELLER, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 45 (01) :1-8
[39]   COGNITIVE LOAD DURING PROBLEM-SOLVING - EFFECTS ON LEARNING [J].
SWELLER, J .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1988, 12 (02) :257-285
[40]   EVIDENCE FOR COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY [J].
SWELLER, J ;
CHANDLER, P .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1991, 8 (04) :351-362