Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load?

被引:261
作者
Cierniak, Gabriele [1 ]
Scheiter, Katharina [2 ]
Gerjets, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, D-72072 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Cognitive load theory; Split-attention effect; Spatial contiguity effect; Cognitive load measurement; Dual task; Subjective ratings; ACQUISITION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; DESIGN; SKILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The phenomenon that the physical integration of verbal and pictorial information sources, compared to their physical separation, enhances learning is known as the split-attention effect. This paper investigates how the split-attention effect can be best explained against the background of cognitive load theory. In an experimental study, students learned about physiological processes with either an integrated or a split-source format. Secondary task performance was used to measure overall cognitive load, whereas subjective ratings were used to measure intrinsic, extraneous and germane load individually. Learners with split-source format achieved lower learning outcomes, but did not show worse secondary task performance than learners with integrated format. These results contradict the assumption that only an increase in extraneous load for learners with a split-source format mediates the split-attention effect. Mediation analyses of the subjective load ratings revealed that both, extraneous and germane load contributed to the split-attention effect. These results support the assumption that germane load also plays a crucial role in mediating the split-attention effect. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 324
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Ayres P., 2005, CAMBRIDGE HDB MULTIM, P134
[2]   Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems [J].
Ayres, Paul .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2006, 16 (05) :389-400
[3]   Is working memory still working? [J].
Baddeley, AD .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 7 (02) :85-97
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   PROBLEMS OF PERCEIVED DIFFICULTY [J].
BORG, G ;
BRATFISC.O ;
DORNIC, S .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 12 (04) :249-&
[6]   A general factor involved in dual-task performance decrement [J].
Bourke, PA ;
Duncan, J ;
NimmoSmith, I .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03) :525-545
[7]   Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning [J].
Brünken, R ;
Plass, JL ;
Leutner, D .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 38 (01) :53-61
[8]   Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology [J].
Brünken, R ;
Steinbacher, S ;
Plass, JL ;
Leutner, D .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 49 (02) :109-119
[9]  
Chandler P, 1996, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V10, P151, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<151::AID-ACP380>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-U