Development of Fuzzy System Dynamics Model to Forecast Bridge Resilience

被引:12
作者
Lad, V. H. [1 ]
Patel, D. A. [1 ]
Chauhan, K. A. [1 ]
Patel, K. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Surat 395007, Gujarat, India
关键词
Bridge; Resilience; Disaster; Fuzzy system dynamics; Fuzzy integral; Delphi method; Simulations; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001952
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The occurrence of disasters such as earthquakes, cyclones, tsunamis, and floods affect the resilience of bridges. In the last four decades, about 2,130 bridges were collapsed due to various disasters in India, and out of these, almost 1,105 bridges were ruined due to floods. However, in the existing practice of measuring the resilience of bridges, resilience matrices overlook the dynamism of bridge resilience and fail to address the uncertainty of variables influencing the resilience of bridges due to floods. Therefore, this study aims to develop the fuzzy system dynamics (FSD) model to simulate and forecast bridge resilience considering complex interconnections among different infrastructures and government systems. For this, the study first shortlists 14 variables related to bridge resilience using the Delphi method. Then, the cause-and-effect feedback loop and stock-and-flow diagram are formulated to explore the interdependency among these system dynamics variables of bridge resilience. Fuzzy measures and integral are used to establish the soft relationships and the existing mathematical formulas to explain the hard relationships in the FSD model. The proposed FSD model is used to simulate and forecast scenarios of the resilience of 12 bridges against floods. The structure and behavior of the FSD model are validated by conducting the dimension consistency test, structure verification test, and sensitivity analysis. The proposed model can be helpful to bridge owners to manage bridge assets, prioritize the repair and rehabilitation of bridges, propose the new bridges, devise the new policy, coordinate with other utilities and governance agencies, and thus enhance the bridge's resilience against floods.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation [J].
Chen, Y. ;
Yu, J. ;
Khan, S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (12) :1582-1591
[12]   Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience [J].
Cimellaro, Gian Paolo ;
Reinhorn, Andrei M. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (11) :3639-3649
[13]   A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges [J].
Deco, Alberto ;
Bocchini, Paolo ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (10) :1469-1487
[14]   Earthquake-Resilience-Based Control Solutions for the Extended Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridge [J].
Domaneschi, M. ;
Martinelli, L. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (08)
[15]   Probabilistic Time-Dependent Multihazard Life-Cycle Assessment and Resilience of Bridges Considering Climate Change [J].
Dong, You ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2016, 30 (05)
[16]   Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties [J].
Dong, You ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 83 :198-208
[17]  
Forrester JW, 1961, Industrial Dynamics
[18]   Evaluation of Resiliency of Transportation Networks After Disasters [J].
Freckleton, Derek ;
Heaslip, Kevin ;
Louisell, William ;
Collura, John .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2284) :109-116
[19]   Analysis of bridge failures in India from 1977 to 2017 [J].
Garg, Rajeev Kumar ;
Chandra, Satish ;
Kumar, Aman .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (03) :295-312
[20]  
Gerami Seresht N., 2015, PROC INT CONSTRUCTIO