Drivers of household appliance usage: Evidence from rural India

被引:13
作者
Richmond, Jennifer [1 ]
Agrawal, Shalu [2 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Council Energy Environm & Water, New Delhi, India
[3] Johns Hopkins SAIS, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
India; Electricity access; Environment; Off-grid energy access; Appliances; Rural development; ELECTRICITY ACCESS; FERTILITY-EVIDENCE; ELECTRIFICATION; SERVICE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.esd.2020.05.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electricity access and appliance usage are integral parts of developing a modern economy in rural areas. Unfor-tunately, many households in rural India struggle to access reliable electricity and, therefore, are unable to power appliances throughout the day. We use household survey data from 10,249 households across the Indian states of Bihar, Odisha, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh to explore potential drivers of electric appliance usage. By applying a series of linear and nonlinear models, we find that grid-connected households have more electricity available to them, and use significantly more electricity to power appliances in each of four designated household appliance categories: lighting (e.g., LEDs and CFLs), cooling (e.g., fans and AC units), entertainment (e.g., phones and TVs), and housekeeping (e.g., refrigerators and irons). Households using alternative power sources, including solar home systems (SHSs) and mini-grids, exhibit high uptake and use of lower-level appli-ances in the lighting and cooling categories, but much less so in the entertainment and housekeeping categories. Grid access is also correlated with higher electricity availability than alternative sources. Electricity availability is shown to be a highly significant predictor for powering appliances for longer time periods in all categories, but especially for more easily attainable appliances in lighting and cooling categories. (C) 2020 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 80
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Agrawal Shalu, 2019, RURAL ELECT INDIA
[2]  
Aklin M., 2018, Escaping the energy poverty trap: When and how governments power the lives of the poor, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/11479.001.0001
[3]   Does basic energy access generate socioeconomic benefits? A field experiment with off-grid solar power in India [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Bayer, Patrick ;
Harish, S. P. ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (05)
[4]  
Aklin M, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1, DOI [10.1038/nenergy.2016.170, 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.170]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CENSUS INDIA
[6]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY POLICY
[7]   Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India [J].
Blankenship, Brian ;
Wong, Jason Chun Yu ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 :459-469
[8]  
Bonan Jacopo, 2014, WORKING PAPERS
[9]  
Burlig, 2016, find no medium-run development effects from a rural electrification program in India
[10]   Productive uses of energy for rural development [J].
Cabraal, RA ;
Barnes, DF ;
Agarwal, SG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2005, 30 :117-144