Estimating cost functions for the four large carnivores in Sweden

被引:26
作者
Bostedt, Goran [1 ]
Grahn, Pontus [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Forest Econ, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Carnivores; Predation; Costs; Economics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The Swedish carnivore policy goal for the four large carnivores - wolverine (Gulo gulo), wolf (Canis lupus), brown bear (Ursus arctos) and lynx (Lynx lynx) - is to ensure a minimum viable population on a long-term basis. To reach this goal the policy restricts population regulation activities, like hunting (prohibited for wolverine and wolf and restricted for brown bear and lynx) in Sweden. For owners of semi-domesticated (i.e. reindeer), and domesticated (livestock) animals this policy and the existence of individuals of these four species results in externalities associated with predation. This paper presents econometric estimates of the predation and the social costs for these four species, based on ecological models of functional response. The data on costs is based on compensation provided to livestock owners by the Swedish government. The paper also applies these econometric estimates to predict the social cost per species when the population goals of the Swedish carnivore policy are reached. Based on out our model the wolverine and the lynx will impose the highest marginal, as well as total costs on society, given the current policy goals. The wolf is an efficient predator, but due to its geographical distribution in Sweden, its social costs are less than anticipated. The brown bear is largely omnivorous, thus resulting in relatively low social costs. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 524
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? [J].
Abrams, PA ;
Ginzburg, LR .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (08) :337-341
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1935, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1096-3642.1935.TB01680.X
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, RENAR ROVDJUR ROVDJU
[4]   The net benefit of saving the Asian elephant: a policy and contingent valuation study [J].
Bandara, R ;
Tisdell, C .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (01) :93-107
[5]   Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: empirical evidence [J].
Bandara, R ;
Tisdell, C .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 110 (03) :327-342
[6]  
Bjarvall A., 1995, Daggdjur: Alla Europas Arter
[7]  
Boardman AE., 1996, Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice
[8]   ESTIMATING COSTS AND GENETIC BENEFITS OF VARIOUS SIZES OF PREDATOR POPULATIONS - THE CASE OF BEAR, WOLF, WOLVERINE AND LYNX IN SWEDEN [J].
BOMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 43 (04) :349-357
[9]   The bioeconomics of the spatial distribution of an endangered species: The case of the Swedish wolf population [J].
Mattias Boman ;
Göran Bostedt ;
Jens Persson .
Journal of Bioeconomics, 2003, 5 (1) :55-74
[10]   Threatened species as public goods and public bads -: An application to wild predators in Sweden [J].
Bostedt, G .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1999, 13 (01) :59-73