共 50 条
Microscopic and nuclear morphometric findings of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, renal oncocytoma, and tumor with overlapping histology
被引:7
|作者:
Kim, Sung Sun
[1
]
Choi, Yoo Duk
[1
]
Shim, Min Keun
[1
]
Kim, Jin
[2
]
Cho, Yong Mee
[3
]
Jang, Ja June
[4
]
Park, Ryung Jin
[5
]
Juhng, Sang Woo
[1
]
Choi, Chan
[1
]
机构:
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Hwasun Hosp, Dept Pathol, Kwangju 501749, South Korea
[2] Seonam Univ, Coll Med, Dept Parasitol, Namwon, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yeosu Seongsim Hosp, Dept Med Sci Ind, Chungnam, South Korea
关键词:
Renal cell carcinoma;
Renal oncocytoma;
Kidney neoplasms;
DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS;
EXPRESSION;
S100A1;
NEOPLASMS;
UTILITY;
GRADE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2012.03.002
中图分类号:
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号:
100104 ;
摘要:
We compared the microscopic and nuclear morphometric characteristics of classical chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (C-ChRC) and renal oncocytoma (RO) and applied meaningful characteristics to differentiate eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (E-ChRC) from RO that has overlapping histology (RO-OH) with E-ChRC to know the usefulness of nuclear morphometry. Microscopic and morphometric characteristics were evaluated in 24 C-ChRCs, 6 E-ChRCs, 5 RO-OHs, and 25 classical ROs (C-ROs). The microscopic findings favoring C-ChRC were rasinoid nuclei, perinuclear halo, and distinct cytoplasmic membrane. Characteristic for C-RO was either stromal edema or hyalinization. The morphometric values of nearest nuclear distance, shortest nuclear diameter, and nuclear diameter ratio were significantly different between C-ChRC and C-RO. However, it was impossible to distinguish E-ChRC from RO-OH by histology and nuclear morphometry. The results of our study show that nuclear morphometry and histomorphology can distinguish between C-ChRC and C-RO but not between E-ChRC and RO-OH. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 435
页数:7
相关论文