Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?

被引:26
作者
Vaiarelli, Alberto [1 ]
Cimadomo, Danilo [1 ,3 ]
Capalbo, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Orlando, Giovanna [1 ]
Sapienza, Fabio [1 ]
Colamaria, Silvia [1 ]
Palagiano, Antonio [4 ]
Bulletti, Carlo [5 ]
Rienzi, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] GENERA Ctr Reprod Med, Rome, Italy
[2] GENETYX, Mol Biol Lab, Marostica, Italy
[3] Univ Rome Sapienza, Dipartimento Sci Anat Istol Med Legali & Apparato, Sez Istol & Embriol Med, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Naples 2, Caserta, Italy
[5] Cattolica Gen Hosp, Physiopathol Reprod Unit, Cattolica, Italy
关键词
PGD; PGD-A; Blastocyst; IVF; Aneuploidy testing; Counselling; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; PREGNANCY FOLLOW-UP; INNER CELL MASS; HUMAN EMBRYOS; SCREENED BLASTOCYSTS; HUMAN ANEUPLOIDY; DIAGNOSIS; AMPLIFICATION; TROPHECTODERM;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-016-0785-2
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) is a tool to identify euploid embryos during IVF. The suggested populations of patients that can benefit from it are infertile women of advanced maternal age, with a history of recurrent miscarriages and/or IVF failures. However, a general consensus has not yet been reached.After the clinical failure of its first version based on cleavage stage biopsy and 9 chromosome-FISH analysis, PGD-A is currently performed by 24 chromosome screening techniques on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. This approach has been clearly demonstrated to involve a higher clinical efficiency with respect to the standard care, in terms of sustained pregnancy rate per transfer and lower miscarriage rate. However, data about PGD-A efficacy calculated on a per intention-to-treat basis, as well as an analysis of its cost-effectiveness, are still missing.TE biopsy is a safe and extensively validated approach with low biological and technical margin of error. Firstly, the prevalence of mosaic diploid/aneuploid blastocysts is estimated to be between 0 and 16 %, thus largely tolerable. Secondly, all the comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technologies adapted to, or designed to conduct PGD-A are highly concordant, and qPCR in particular has been proven to show the lowest false positive error rate (0.5 %) and a clinically recognizable error rate per blastocyst of just 0.21 %.In conclusion, there is a sufficient body of evidence to support the clinical application of CCS-based PGD-A on TE biopsies. The main limiting factor is the need for a high-standard laboratory to conduct blastocyst culture, biopsy and vitrification without impacting embryo viability.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1278
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies
    Capalbo, Antonio
    Treff, Nathan R.
    Cimadomo, Danilo
    Tao, Xin
    Upham, Kathleen
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    Rienzi, Laura
    Scott, Richard T., Jr.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (07) : 901 - 906
  • [2] Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts
    Capalbo, Antonio
    Rienzi, Laura
    Cimadomo, Danilo
    Maggiulli, Roberta
    Elliott, Thomas
    Wright, Graham
    Nagy, Zsolt Peter
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (06) : 1173 - 1181
  • [3] FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage
    Capalbo, Antonio
    Wright, Graham
    Elliott, Thomas
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    Rienzi, Laura
    Nagy, Zsolt Peter
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (08) : 2298 - 2307
  • [4] Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012
    Chang, Jeani
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Jeng, Gary
    Flowers, Lisa
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (02) : 394 - 400
  • [5] Can Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Technology Improve IVF/ICSI Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Minghao
    Wei, Shiyou
    Hu, Junyan
    Quan, Song
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [6] Coonen E, 2015, ESHRE ANN M
  • [7] Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis
    Dandouh, Elias M.
    Balayla, Jacques
    Antonio Garcia-Velasco, Juan
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (06) : 1503 - 1512
  • [8] Technical Update: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening
    Dandouh, Elias M.
    Balayla, Jacques
    Audibert, Francois
    Wilson, R. Douglas
    Audibert, Francois
    Brock, Jo-Ann
    Campagnolo, Carla
    Carroll, June
    Chong, Karen
    Gagnon, Alain
    Johnson, Jo-Ann
    MacDonald, William
    Okun, Nanette
    Pastuck, Melanie
    Vallee-Pouliot, Karine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2015, 37 (05) : 451 - 463
  • [9] Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates
    Forman, Eric J.
    Hong, Kathleen H.
    Franasiak, Jason M.
    Scott, Richard T., Jr.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (02) : 157.e1 - 157.e6
  • [10] In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial
    Forman, Eric J.
    Hong, Kathleen H.
    Ferry, Kathleen M.
    Tao, Xin
    Taylor, Deanne
    Levy, Brynn
    Treff, Nathan R.
    Scott, Richard T., Jr.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (01) : 100 - +