A short geriatric assessment tool for the older person with cancer in India-Development and psychometric validation

被引:12
作者
Banerjee, Joyita [1 ]
Satapathy, Jata [2 ]
Upadhyay, Ashish Dutt [3 ]
Dwivedi, Sada Nand [3 ]
Chatterjee, Prasun [1 ]
Kumar, Lalit [4 ]
Rath, Goura Kishor [5 ]
Dey, Aparajit Ballav [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Geriatr Med, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Psychiat, New Delhi, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Med Oncol, New Delhi, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Delhi, India
关键词
CGA; Geriatric screening; Cancer patients; INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES; CRITICAL-VALUES; VALIDITY; ASSOCIATION; PATIENT; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2018.09.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: With rise in incidence and prevalence of cancers in the ageing population, the need for an age sensitive comprehensive assessment measure has been felt. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is often difficult to implement due to time and logistic constraints. A brief assessment tool encompassing the specific domains of the CGA would be a better way to assess older adults with cancer. These tools exist but have not necessarily been culturally adapted. The main aim of the study was to develop a culturally relevant short geriatric assessment tool and explore its psychometric properties. Methodology: An initial item pool was formed after review of the literature and study of the existing scales. This draft tool was then pre and pilot tested to finalize the items and check the feasibility of application. The final tool was validated by exploratory factor analysis on a sample of 100 older patients with cancer. Results: After pre and pilot study on fifteen and thirty older patients with cancer respectively, this tool consisting of a total of 38 items spread over eight domains was developed and validated on a sample of 100 subjects. Due to co-linearity, three items were deleted after exploratory factor analysis, bringing the final item number to 35. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.93 and the intra-class correlation co-efficient (ICC) was 0.94. Thus, the final tool had 13 questions with sub-parts (35 items in total). The time taken to administer the tool was around 25 min. Conclusion: The tool developed is valid and reliable and can be used for the initial assessment and further care planning of older Indian patients with cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 228
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J BIO ENG NEURO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SDD SPPS PROJECT WOR
[3]   Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation [J].
Ayre, Colin ;
Scally, Andrew John .
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 47 (01) :79-86
[4]  
Balducci Lodovico, 2005, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V3, P572
[5]  
Beavers A.S., 2013, Pract. Assess., Res. Eval., V18, P6, DOI DOI 10.7275/QV2Q-RK76
[6]   Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool [J].
Bellera, C. A. ;
Rainfray, M. ;
Mathoulin-Pelissier, S. ;
Mertens, C. ;
Delva, F. ;
Fonck, M. ;
Soubeyran, P. L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (08) :2166-2172
[7]   Polypharmacy: Misleading, but manageable [J].
Bushardt, Reamer L. ;
Massey, Emily B. ;
Simpson, Temple W. ;
Ariail, Jane C. ;
Simpson, Kit N. .
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2008, 3 (02) :383-389
[8]  
Caillet P, 2014, CLIN INTERV AGING, V9, P1645, DOI 10.2147/CIA.S57849
[9]   Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations [J].
Decoster, L. ;
Van Puyvelde, K. ;
Mohile, S. ;
Wedding, U. ;
Basso, U. ;
Colloca, G. ;
Rostoft, S. ;
Overcash, J. ;
Wildiers, H. ;
Steer, C. ;
Kimmick, G. ;
Kanesvaran, R. ;
Luciani, A. ;
Terret, C. ;
Hurria, A. ;
Kenis, C. ;
Audisio, R. ;
Extermann, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) :288-300
[10]   Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital [J].
Ellis, Graham ;
Whitehead, Martin A. ;
O'Neill, Desmond ;
Langhorne, Peter ;
Robinson, David .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (07)