Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for lumbar spine fusion

被引:82
作者
Smith, Justin [1 ]
Probst, Stephen [1 ]
Calandra, Colleen [2 ]
Davis, Raphael [2 ]
Sugimoto, Kentaro [1 ]
Nie, Lizhou [3 ]
Gan, Tong J. [1 ]
Bennett-Guerrero, Elliott [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Appl Math & Stat, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
ERAS; Lumbar fusion; QI spine; Spine surgery; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; BACK-PAIN; CONSUMPTION; GUIDELINES; PROTOCOL; STAY;
D O I
10.1186/s13741-019-0114-2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere is a paucity of literature regarding the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for open lumbar spine fusions. We implemented an ERAS program for 1-2-level lumbar spine fusion surgery and identified areas that might benefit from perioperative interventions to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.MethodsThis institutionally approved quality improvement (QI) ERAS program for lumbar spine fusion was designed for all neurosurgical patients 18years and older scheduled for 1 or 2 level primary lumbar fusions. The ERAS bundle contained elements such as multimodal analgesia including preoperative oral acetaminophen and gabapentin, postoperative early mobilization and physical therapy, and a prophylactic multimodal antiemetic regimen to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting. No fluid management or hemodynamic parameters were included. Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS data were compared with regard to potential confounders, compliance with the ERAS bundle, and postoperative outcomes.ResultsA total of 230 patients were included from October 2013 to May 2017. The pre-ERAS phase consisted of 123 patients, 11 patients during the transition period, and 96 serving as post-ERAS patients. The pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups had comparable demographics and comorbidities. Compliance with preoperative and intraoperative medication interventions was relatively good (similar to 80%). Compliance with postoperative elements such as early physical therapy, early mobilization, and early removal of the urinary catheter was poor with no significant improvement in post-ERAS patients. There was no significant change in the amount of short-acting opioids used, but there was a decrease in the use of long-acting opioids in the post-ERAS phase (14.6 to 5.2%, p=0.025). Post-ERAS patients required fewer rescue antiemetic medications in the recovery room compared to pre-ERAS patients (40 to 24%). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores or hospital length of stay between the two groups.ConclusionsImplementing anERAS bundle for 1-2-level lumbar fusion had minimal effect in decreasing length of stay, but a significant decrease in postoperative opioid and rescue antiemetic use. This ERAS bundle showed mixed results likely secondary to poor ERAS protocol compliance. Going forward, this QI project will look to improve post-operative ERAS implementation to improve patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Pre-optimization of spinal surgery patients: Development of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol
    Ali, Zarina S.
    Ma, Tracy S.
    Ozturk, Ali K.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    Schuster, James M.
    Marcotte, Paul J.
    Grady, M. Sean
    Welch, William C.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 164 : 142 - 153
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, J CLIN OUTCOMES MANA
  • [3] Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Apfel, C. C.
    Heidrich, F. M.
    Jukar-Rao, S.
    Jalota, L.
    Hornuss, C.
    Whelan, R. P.
    Zhang, K.
    Cakmakkaya, O. S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 109 (05) : 742 - 753
  • [4] The Effect of Fear of Movement Beliefs on Pain and Disability After Surgery for Lumbar and Cervical Degenerative Conditions
    Archer, Kristin R.
    Wegener, Stephen T.
    Seebach, Caryn
    Song, Yanna
    Skolasky, Richard L.
    Thornton, Colleen
    Khanna, A. Jay
    Riley, Lee H., III
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (19) : 1554 - 1562
  • [5] Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain
    Childs, JD
    Piva, SR
    Fritz, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) : 1331 - 1334
  • [6] A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally
    Dagenais, Simon
    Caro, Jaime
    Haldeman, Scott
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) : 8 - 20
  • [7] Enhanced Recovery Protocol after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer
    Daneshmand, Siamak
    Ahmadi, Hamed
    Schuckman, Anne K.
    Mitra, Anirban P.
    Cai, Jie
    Miranda, Gus
    Djaladat, Hooman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [8] Primary care - Low back pain
    Deyo, RA
    Weinstein, JN
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (05) : 363 - 370
  • [9] A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of prophylactic gabapentin for postoperative pain
    Doleman, B.
    Heinink, T. P.
    Read, D. J.
    Faleiro, R. J.
    Lund, J. N.
    Williams, J. P.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (10) : 1186 - 1204
  • [10] A Rapid Recovery Pathway for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis That Improves Pain Control and Reduces Time to Inpatient Recovery after Posterior Spinal Fusion
    Gornitzky A.L.
    Flynn J.M.
    Muhly W.T.
    Sankar W.N.
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2016, 4 (4) : 288 - 295