Fostering resilient agro-food futures through a social-ecological systems framework: Public-private partnerships for delivering ecosystem services in Europe

被引:17
作者
Dwyer, Janet [1 ]
Short, Chris [1 ]
Berriet-solliec, Marielle [2 ]
Depres, Christophe [3 ]
Lataste, Francois-Gael [4 ]
Hart, Kaley [5 ]
Prazan, Jaroslav [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gloucestershire, Countryside & Community Res Inst, Francis Close Hall Campus,Swindon Rd, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, Glos, England
[2] INRA Agrosup Dijon, Dijon, France
[3] Vetagro Sup, Clermont Ferrand, France
[4] BRL Ingn, Nimes, France
[5] Inst European Environm Policy, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Inst Agr Econ & Informat, Prague, Czech Republic
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Public goods; Social-ecological systems; Sustainable agriculture; European Union policy; Collective action; Public-private partnerships;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101180
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In recent decades, various public policies have targeted agriculture and forestry's relationship with environ-mental protection and management. Among environmental policy communities the approach is increasingly framed through the theoretical concepts of ecosystem services (ES) or public goods (PG). Both offer useful perspectives to enhance understanding, but each only partially reflects the complex inter-linkages between productive land management and multiple environmental and social assets (biodiversity, landscapes, water, soil and air quality, rural vitality, culture and heritage), constraining their capacity for effective policy development. The Social-Ecological-Systems framework (SES), considering both natural and socio-economic elements in complex systems and interrogating these joint production relationships, offers added value in this context. The PEGASUS project1 applied an adapted SES framework to identify the potential complementary and synergistic roles of policy, private and community actors in promoting socially beneficial outcomes, strengthening ecosystem services and sustainability. Two case studies illustrate the analytical process and its ability to connect top down and bottom-up perspectives. This generated an expanded range of options focused on social processes and market development facilitated by an enabling, responsive policy framework. Lessons for governance and practice, as well as international relevance, are briefly considered.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, EC RURALE, DOI DOI 10.3406/AFDI.2006.3935
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well Being: a Framework for Assessment
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Environment, Social Justice
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, technical report (No. 30- CE- 0233091/00-28
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EC ECOSYSTEMBIODIV
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EC ECOSYSTEMS BIODIV
[9]  
Barthelemy D., 2003, La multifonctionnalite de lactivite agricole et sa reconnaissance par les politiques publiques, P107
[10]  
BAZIN G, 2003, EC RURAL, V273, P236