Development and Validation of an Environmental Health Literacy Assessment Screening Tool for Domestic Well Owners: The Water Environmental Literacy Level Scale (WELLS)

被引:16
作者
Irvin, Veronica L. [1 ]
Rohlman, Diana [1 ]
Vaughan, Amelia [1 ]
Amantia, Rebecca [1 ]
Berlin, Claire [1 ]
Kile, Molly L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
关键词
water; domestic well; health literacy; environment; scale development; scale diagnostics; DRINKING-WATER; PRIVATE; PERCEPTIONS; DISPARITIES; NUMERACY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph16050881
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the U.S., privately owned wells are not subject to any regulatory testing requirements. Well owners must have sufficient environmental health literacy (EHL) to understand and interpret information that contain complex terms and labels to manage their water quality. The objective of this paper is to assess the performance and validity of a new EHL screening tool. The Water Environmental Literacy Level Scale (WELLS) is based on the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) and contains six questions on comprehension, calculations and application of information. Content validity was assessed from expert review. Criterion-related and construct validity were evaluated using an online, convenience sample of adults (n = 869). Percent of correct responses for items ranged from 53% to 96% for NVS and from 41% to 97% for WELLS. Completion time, mean scores, distributions, and internal consistency were equivalent between both scales. Higher scores suggest higher EHL. The scales were moderately correlated ( = 0.47, p < 0.001). Kappa agreement was 74%. Bland-Altman plots depicted little mean difference between the scales. Education and income level were positively associated with EHL. WELLS showed criterion-validity with NVS and construct validity with education and income. In practice or research, WELLS could quickly screen individuals for low EHL.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review [J].
Altin, Sibel Vildan ;
Finke, Isabelle ;
Kautz-Freimuth, Sibylle ;
Stock, Stephanie .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HLTH LITERACY PRESCR
[3]  
[Anonymous], BEH RISK FACT SURV S
[4]   Comparisons of Online Recruitment Strategies for Convenience Samples: Craigslist, Google AdWords, Facebook, and Amazon Mechanical Turk [J].
Antoun, Christopher ;
Zhang, Chan ;
Conrad, Frederick G. ;
Schober, Michael F. .
FIELD METHODS, 2016, 28 (03) :231-246
[5]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[6]  
Berkman ND., 2004, AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries
[7]   Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual [J].
Bland, J. Martin ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) :571-582
[8]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UND LIT NUM UND LIT NUM
[10]   Nonnaivete among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Mueller, Pam ;
Paolacci, Gabriele .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (01) :112-130