Dental Implants with Conical Implant-Abutment Interface: Influence of the Conical Angle Difference on the Mechanical Behavior of the Implant

被引:22
作者
Aguirrebeitia, Josu [1 ]
Abasolo, Mikel [1 ]
Vallejo, Javier [1 ]
Ansola, Ruben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, ETSI BILBAO, Dept Mech Engn, Bilbao 48013, Spain
关键词
conical angle difference; conical implant; finite element model; sensitivity study; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; BACTERIAL LEAKAGE; PROSTHESIS; COMPONENTS; SYSTEM; DOGS; FIT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.2775
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Misfit in the conical implant-abutment interface plays an important role on the mechanical behavior of the implant when masticatory forces are applied. The origin of the misfit adopted in this work is a conical angle difference between implant and abutment, which can be due to a combination of design decisions and manufacturing tolerances. The goal of this work was to investigate the effects of the implant-abutment conical angle difference in the following mechanical features: interfacial microgap, preload loss on the bolt, stress level in the bone, and abutment removal force and/or torque. Materials and Methods: A simplified three-dimensional nonlinear monoparametric finite element model of an OsseoSpeed TX 4.5 S 9-mm implant (Astra Tech) with a tapered implant-abutment interface was built to evaluate the variability of the mechanical features cited above with the conical angle difference, keeping constant the overall geometry, load and boundary conditions, material properties, frictional behavior, and mesh structure. Results: As the conical angle difference increased, the following effects were observed: the microgap decreased and remained almost constant for values over a given positive angle difference, the stress level in the bone increased sensitively, the removal force and/or torque needed to separate the abutment from the implant varied slightly, and the bolt preload loss increased. Conclusions: In light of the results provided, the conical angle difference in the implant-abutment interface had a significant influence on the overall mechanical behavior of the implant. Among the four mechanical features considered, the interfacial microgap and the bone stress were demonstrated to be the most sensitive to the conical angle difference, and therefore the most relevant when selecting an optimum value in the design process of a conical interface.
引用
收藏
页码:E72 / E82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability [J].
Shin, Hyon-Mo ;
Huh, Jung-Bo ;
Yun, Mi-Jeong ;
Jeon, Young-Chan ;
Chang, Brian Myung ;
Jeong, Chang-Mo .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2014, 6 (02) :126-132
[42]   Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck [J].
Liu, Yang ;
Wang, Jiawei .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 83 :153-160
[43]   Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system [J].
Kitagawa, T ;
Tanimoto, Y ;
Odaki, M ;
Nemoto, K ;
Aida, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2005, 75B (02) :457-463
[44]   Evaluation of resistance against bacterial microleakage of a new conical implant-abutment connection versus conventional connections: an in vitro study [J].
Gherlone, Enrico Felice ;
Cappare, Paolo ;
Pasciuta, Renee ;
Grusovin, Maria Gabriella ;
Mancini, Nicasio ;
Burioni, Roberto .
NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2016, 39 (01) :49-56
[45]   Effectiveness of Sealing Gel on Vertical Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Interface and Preload Maintenance of Screw- Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses [J].
Seloto, Camila Berbel ;
Strazzi-Sahyon, Henrico Badaoui ;
dos Santos, Paulo Henrique ;
Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (03) :479-484
[46]   Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components [J].
do Nascimento, C. ;
Barbosa, R. E. S. ;
Issa, J. P. M. ;
Watanabe, E. ;
Ito, I. Y. ;
Junior, R. F. Albuquerque .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 37 (02) :177-180
[47]   Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant-abutment interface designs [J].
Tang, Chun-Bo ;
Liu, Si-Yu ;
Zhou, Guo-Xing ;
Yu, Jin-Hua ;
Zhang, Guang-Dong ;
Bao, Yi-Dong ;
Wang, Qiu-Ju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 4 (02) :101-108
[48]   Differences in micromorphology of the implant-abutment junction for original and third-party abutments on a representative dental implant [J].
Fokas, George ;
Ma, Li ;
Chronopoulos, Vasilios ;
Janda, Martin ;
Mattheos, Nikos .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (01) :143-150
[49]   In Vitro Evaluation of Bacterial Leakage Along the Implant-Abutment Interface of an External-Hex Implant After Saliva Incubation [J].
do Nascimento, Cassio ;
Miani, Paola Kirsten ;
Watanabe, Evandro ;
Pedrazzi, Vinicius ;
de Albuquerque, Rubens Ferreira, Jr. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (04) :782-787
[50]   Comparison of Implant-Abutment Interface Misfits After Casting and Soldering Procedures [J].
das Neves, Flavio Domingues ;
Elias, Gisele Araujo ;
da Silva-Neto, Joao Paulo ;
de Medeiros Dantas, Lucas Costa ;
Fernandes Neto, Alfredo Julio .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 40 (02) :129-136