Determining Cochlear Implant Users' True Noise Tolerance: Use of Speech Reception Threshold in Noise Testing

被引:7
作者
Poissant, Sarah F. [1 ,2 ]
Bero, Eva M. [3 ]
Busekroos, Lauren [4 ]
Shao, Weiru [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Commun Disorders, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Otolaryngol, Sch Med, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] UMass Mem Med Ctr, Amherst, MA USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[5] UMass Mem Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Amherst, MA USA
关键词
Cochlear implants; Noise; Outcomes; QuickSIN; Speech perception; Speech reception threshold; NORMAL-HEARING; BKB-SIN; RECOGNITION; LISTENERS; MASKERS; LISTS;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000000246
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The speech perception abilities of cochlear implant (CI) recipients have significantly improved over the past decade. At the same time, clinical test batteries to measure their performance in noise remain mostly unchanged, resulting in ceiling-level performance for the most successful recipients. The goal of this study is to determine the true noise tolerance abilities of CI recipients using adaptive speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise testing. Study Design Prospective clinical study. Setting Tertiary care hospital; CI program. Patients Ten CI users, either unilateral or bilateral, with HINT scores that equaled or exceeded 80% when administered with a fixed +10 dB signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio (i.e., HINT+10dB). Intervention The HINT with adaptive SNR levels and QuickSIN test were administered to measure noise tolerance at speech thresholds where 50% of the stimuli were correctly perceived. Main Outcome Measure(s) SRTs were measured for both the adaptive SNR HINT (i.e., HINT50%) and the QuickSIN test. These SRTs were compared with the fixed noise level HINT+10dB scores as well as to CNC monosyllable word perception scores. Results Despite small variance in performance levels on the HINT+10dB, results of the HINT50% (approximate to 16 dB range) and QuickSIN (approximate to 12 dB range) tests demonstrate significant differences in noise tolerance levels among these CI recipients. Conclusion For excellent CI users, use of adaptive speech threshold tests in noise better defines a user's actual ability to perceive speech than do fixed SNR level tests. SRT-in-noise tests have the advantage of being quick to administer, and the same stimuli can be used over a very wide range of performance levels. The use of adaptive SRT-in-noise tests should be considered a viable and valuable replacement of fixed SNR tests in the CI clinical test battery.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, QUICKSIN SPEECH NOIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HEAR NOIS TEST
[3]   Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users [J].
Chan, Jenny C. Y. ;
Freed, Daniel J. ;
Vermiglio, Andrew J. ;
Soli, Sigfrid D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 (06) :296-310
[4]   A MULTIPLE-CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT - AN EVALUATION USING CLOSED-SET SPONDAIC WORDS [J].
CLARK, GM ;
TONG, YC ;
MARTIN, LFA .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1981, 95 (05) :461-464
[5]  
Clark GM, 1983, MED J AUSTRALIA, V29, P430
[6]  
DOWELL RC, 1984, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P230
[7]  
Etymotic Research Inc, 2005, BKB SIN TEST VERS 1
[8]   Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems [J].
Firszt, JB ;
Holden, LK ;
Skinner, MW ;
Tobey, EA ;
Peterson, A ;
Gaggl, W ;
Runge-Samuelson, CL ;
Wackym, PA .
EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (04) :375-387
[9]   Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs [J].
Gifford, Rene H. ;
Shallop, Jon K. ;
Peterson, Anna Mary .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2008, 13 (03) :193-205
[10]   Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners [J].
Killion, MC ;
Niquette, PA ;
Gudmundsen, GI ;
Revit, LJ ;
Banerjee, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (04) :2395-2405