Commonality and differences of methylation signatures in the plasma of patients with pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Melson, Joshua [1 ]
Li, Yan [2 ]
Cassinotti, Elisa [3 ]
Melnikov, Anatoliy [4 ]
Boni, Luigi [3 ]
Ai, Junmei [2 ]
Greenspan, Michael [1 ]
Mobarhan, Sohrab [1 ]
Levenson, Victor [4 ]
Deng, Youping [2 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Digest Dis, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Canc Ctr Quantitat Sci Core, Dept Internal Med,Dept Biochem, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Insubria, Minimally Invas Surg Res Ctr, Dept Surg Sci, Varese, Italy
[4] US Biomarkers Inc, Buffalo Grove, NY USA
关键词
methylation; biomarkers; pancreatic cancer; colorectal cancer; cancer screening; epigenetics; STOOL DNA TEST; PERIPHERAL-BLOOD; BREAST; GENES; HYPERMETHYLATION; PREPROENKEPHALIN; COLONOSCOPY; STATISTICS; BIOMARKERS; NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.28593
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Profiling of DNA methylation status of specific genes is a way to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) and pancreatic cancer (PC) in blood. The commonality of methylation status of cancer-related tumor suppressor genes between CRC and PC is largely unknown. Methylation status of 56 cancer-related genes was compared in plasma of patients in the following cohorts: CRC, PC and healthy controls. Cross validation determined the best model by area under ROC curve (AUC) to differentiate cancer methylation profiles from controls. Optimal preferential gene methylation signatures were derived to differentiate either cancer (CRC or PC) from controls. For CRC alone, a three gene signature (CYCD2, HIC and VHL) had an AUC 0.9310, sensitivity (Sens)=0.826, specificity (Spec)=0.9383. For PC alone, an optimal signature consisted of five genes (VHL, MYF3, TMS, GPC3 and SRBC), AUC 0.848; Sens=0.807, Spec=0.666. Combined PC and CRC signature or combined cancer signature was derived to differentiate either CRC and PC from controls (MDR1, SRBC, VHL, MUC2, RB1, SYK and GPC3) AUC=0.8177, Sens=0.6316 Spec=0.840. In a validation cohort, N=10 CRC patients, the optimal CRC signature (CYCD2, HIC and VHL) had AUC 0.900. In all derived signatures (CRC, PC and combined cancer signature) the optimal panel used preferential VHL methylation. In conclusion, CRC and PC differ in specific genes methylated in plasma other than VHL. Preferential methylation of VHL is shared in the optimal signature for CRC alone, PC alone and combined PC and CRC. Future investigations may identify additional methylation markers informative for the presence of both CRC and PC. What's new? The potential use of the methylation status of cancer-related genes as a biomarker for plasma-based screening is an area of investigation for both pancreatic and colorectal cancer. While there is evidence that pancreatic and colorectal cancer may share methylation markerswhich might enable concomitant and non-invasive screeninghow similar their methylation profiles is remains unknown. Here, the authors defined the best methylation signature for both pancreatic and colorectal cancer and identified VHL as a shared optimal marker. The findings suggest that the methylation status of genes may be utilized as a potential source of information on both types of tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:2656 / 2662
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a plasma cell-free DNA methylation test for colorectal cancer diagnosis: a multicenter clinical study
    Wang, Zhijie
    He, Zixuan
    Lin, Rong
    Feng, Zhijie
    Li, Xiuling
    Sui, Xiangyu
    Gu, Lun
    Xia, Tian
    Zhou, Dihan
    Zhao, Bali
    Li, Yanqing
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Bai, Yu
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [32] Deciphering gene expression signatures in liver metastasized colorectal cancer in stage IV colorectal cancer patients
    Rasool, Mahmood
    Karim, Sajjad
    Haque, Absarul
    Alharthi, Mohammed
    Chaudhary, Adeel G.
    Pushparaj, Peter Natesan
    JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY SCIENCE, 2024, 36 (09)
  • [33] Diagnosing and monitoring pancreatic cancer through cell-free DNA methylation: progress and prospects
    María Victoria García-Ortiz
    Pablo Cano-Ramírez
    Marta Toledano-Fonseca
    Enrique Aranda
    Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza
    Biomarker Research, 11
  • [34] MicroRNA Methylation in Colorectal Cancer
    Kaur, Sippy
    Lotsari-Salomaa, Johanna E.
    Seppanen-Kaijansinkko, Riitta
    Peltomaki, Paivi
    NON-CODING RNAS IN COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 937 : 109 - 122
  • [35] DNA methylation as an epigenetic biomarker in colorectal cancer
    Silva, Tiago Donizetti
    Vidigal, Veronica Marques
    Felipe, Aledson Vitor
    De Lima, Jacqueline Miranda
    Artigiani Neto, Ricardo
    Saad, Sarhan Sidney
    Forones, Nora Manoukian
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 6 (06) : 1687 - 1692
  • [36] Plasma miRNAs Effectively Distinguish Patients With Pancreatic Cancer From Controls A Multicenter Study
    Xu, Jianwei
    Cao, Zhe
    Liu, Wenjing
    You, Lei
    Zhou, Li
    Wang, Chunyou
    Lou, Wenhui
    Sun, Bei
    Miao, Yi
    Liu, Xubao
    Zhang, Taiping
    Zhao, Yupei
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (06) : 1173 - 1179
  • [37] Methylation status are associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer in Taiwan span
    Lee, Chia-Cheng
    Kuo, Yu-Cheng
    Hu, Je-Ming
    Chang, Pi-Kai
    Sun, Chien-An
    Yang, Tsan
    Li, Chuan-Wang
    Chen, Chao-Yang
    Lin, Fu-Huang
    Hsu, Chih-Hsiung
    Chou, Yu-Ching
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (34) : 5737 - 5752
  • [38] CLOCK'ing differences in DNA methylation signatures to understand the molecular etiology of lung cancer
    Neely, Aaron M.
    Yang, Minxiao
    Marconett, Crystal N.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (06) : 1338 - 1341
  • [39] The Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer, Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer
    Chen, Shiu-Jau
    Wang, Shao-Cheng
    Chen, Yuan-Chuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (23)
  • [40] DNA methylation biomarkers for predicting lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer
    Sun, Yu
    Kong, Deyang
    Zhang, Qi
    Xiang, Renshen
    Lu, Shuaibing
    Feng, Lin
    Zhang, Haizeng
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 27 (02) : 439 - 448