Does Raising Type 1 Error Rate Improve Power to Detect Interactions in Linear Regression Models? A Simulation Study

被引:68
作者
Durand, Casey P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Promot & Behav Sci, Michael & Susan Dell Ctr Hlth Living, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; SAMPLE-SIZE; STATISTICAL POWER; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0071079
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction: Statistical interactions are a common component of data analysis across a broad range of scientific disciplines. However, the statistical power to detect interactions is often undesirably low. One solution is to elevate the Type 1 error rate so that important interactions are not missed in a low power situation. To date, no study has quantified the effects of this practice on power in a linear regression model. Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation study was performed. A continuous dependent variable was specified, along with three types of interactions: continuous variable by continuous variable; continuous by dichotomous; and dichotomous by dichotomous. For each of the three scenarios, the interaction effect sizes, sample sizes, and Type 1 error rate were varied, resulting in a total of 240 unique simulations. Results: In general, power to detect the interaction effect was either so low or so high at alpha = 0.05 that raising the Type 1 error rate only served to increase the probability of including a spurious interaction in the model. A small number of scenarios were identified in which an elevated Type 1 error rate may be justified. Conclusions: Routinely elevating Type 1 error rate when testing interaction effects is not an advisable practice. Researchers are best served by positing interaction effects a priori and accounting for them when conducting sample size calculations.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   STATISTICAL POWER PROBLEMS WITH MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
AGUINIS, H .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1995, 21 (06) :1141-1158
[2]   Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power [J].
Aguinis, H ;
StoneRomero, EF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :192-206
[3]   A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effects of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression [J].
Aguinis, H ;
Boik, RJ ;
Pierce, CA .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2001, 4 (04) :291-323
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MULTIPLE ANAL CLIN T
[5]   Simulation methods to estimate design power: an overview for applied research [J].
Arnold, Benjamin F. ;
Hogan, Daniel R. ;
Colford, John M., Jr. ;
Hubbard, Alan E. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[6]   Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents [J].
Bennette, Caroline ;
Vickers, Andrew .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
[7]   EVALUATING THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF VARIABLES [J].
BLALOCK, HM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1961, 26 (06) :866-874
[8]   Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test [J].
Brookes, ST ;
Whitely, E ;
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Mulheran, PA ;
Peters, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (03) :229-236
[9]   Synergistic interaction effect between job control and social support at work on general psychological distress [J].
Choi, BongKyoo ;
Ostergren, Per-Olof ;
Canivet, Catarina ;
Moghadassi, Mahnaz ;
Lindeberg, Sara ;
Karasek, Robert ;
Isacsson, Sven-Olof .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2011, 84 (01) :77-89
[10]   Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression [J].
Dupont, WD ;
Plummer, WD .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 19 (06) :589-601