Combined systems based on OSOFC/HSOFC: Comparative analysis and multi-objective optimization of power and emission

被引:20
作者
Mojaver, Parisa [1 ]
Khalilarya, Shahram [1 ]
Chitsaz, Ata [1 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ, Fac Engn, Mech Engn Dept, Orumiyeh, Iran
关键词
comparative analysis; HSOFC; multi‐ objective optimization; OSOFC; OXIDE FUEL-CELL; INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHODOLOGY; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; CARBON-DIOXIDE; HEAT; STEAM; SIMULATION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1002/er.6173
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
An integrated system, including a biomass gasifier, a solid oxide fuel cell, heat pipes, and an organic Rankine cycle, was modeled and validated. The system performance was assessed in two different cases based on: (a) oxygen-ion conducting electrolyte and (b) proton-conducting electrolyte solid oxide fuel cells. At low current densities, the system based on proton-conducting electrolyte cell presented larger values of power. In contrast, the system based on oxygen-ion conducting electrolyte cell had a better performance from power viewpoint at high current densities. This phenomenon was similar for energy and exergy efficiencies and emission. The comparative analysis revealed that the system based on oxygen-ion conducting electrolyte cell had higher power output than the system based on proton-conducting electrolyte cell (204.2 kW against 178.7 kW) at their optimum conditions, while the system based on proton-conducting electrolyte cell presented lower emission (996.5 kg/MW h against 1560.7 kg/MW h). The TOPSIS method was utilized to solve the multi-criteria decision-making problem. The results indicated that the system based on proton-conducting electrolyte cell had a better performance than the system based on oxygen-ion conducting electrolyte cell.
引用
收藏
页码:5449 / 5469
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a novel CHP system based on SOFC and APC cycles
    Ahmadi, Samareh
    Ghaebi, Hadi
    Shokri, Afshar
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 186
  • [2] Modeling and performance optimization of a solid oxide electrolysis system for hydrogen production
    AlZahrani, Abdullah A.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 : 471 - 485
  • [3] Modeling of biomass gasification: A review
    Baruah, Dipal
    Baruah, D. C.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 : 806 - 815
  • [4] Bruckner T, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P511
  • [5] Process optimization and robustness analysis of municipal solid waste gasification using air-carbon dioxide mixtures as gasifying agent
    Cardoso, Joao
    Silva, Valter
    Eusebio, Daniela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (09) : 4715 - 4728
  • [6] Cengel YA, 2007, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach 6th Editon (SI Units)
  • [7] Combined methane reforming by carbon dioxide and steam in proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells for syngas/power co-generation
    Chen, Bin
    Xu, Haoran
    Zhang, Yuan
    Dong, Feifei
    Tan, Peng
    Zhao, Tianshou
    Ni, Meng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (29) : 15313 - 15321
  • [8] Exergoenvironmental comparison of internal reforming against external reforming in a cogeneration system based on solid oxide fuel cell using an evolutionary algorithm
    Chitsaz, Ata
    Sadeghi, Mohsen
    Sadeghi, Maesoumeh
    Ghanbarloo, Elham
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 144 : 420 - 431
  • [9] Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation
    Datta, Amitava
    Ganguly, Ranjan
    Sarkar, Luna
    [J]. ENERGY, 2010, 35 (01) : 341 - 350
  • [10] Dincer I, 2012, EXERGY ENERGY